ACSV vs AESL

ACSV vs AESL

Which is better, ACSV or AESL?

AESL costs less.

AESL has a lower expense ratio. ACSV is less concentrated, with 17.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 26.7%.

Lower Fees: AESLLess Concentrated: ACSV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricACSVAESL
Expense Ratio0.49%0.40%Best
AUM$24M$2M
Dividend Yield1.08%0.00%
Holdings419102
YTD Return+14.75%Best-2.65%
1Y Return+18.36%-
Top 10 Weight17.4%Best26.7%
Fund FamilyAmerican Century ETFsHarbor Funds
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleSmall Cap ValueSmall Cap Value
InceptionOct 14, 2025Aug 26, 2026

Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

ACSV vs AESL growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare ACSV against instead:ACSV vs SPYACSV vs QQQACSV vs VOOACSV vs VTIAESL against:AESL vs VXUS

ACSV vs AESL Performance

American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF (ACSV) is an ETF from American Century ETFs and Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Value ETF (AESL) is an ETF from Harbor Funds. Year to date, ACSV is up 14.75% versus a loss of 2.65% for AESL.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ACSV charges 0.49% per year while AESL charges 0.40%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $40 annually, a gap of $9 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACSV currently yields 1.08% against 0.00% for AESL.

Holdings Overlap

ACSV already in AESL15.7%
AESL already in ACSV28.5%

15.7% of ACSV's money is in holdings AESL also owns. 28.5% of AESL's money is in holdings ACSV also owns.

AESL and ACSV share little of their money.

26 positions in common, counted across the 201 positions we hold weights for in ACSV and 126 in AESL, against full books of 419 and 102.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 90 positions for AESL that do not appear in our book for ACSV (66.0% of the fund), and 159 for ACSV that do not appear in AESL (79.3%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in ACSVWeight in AESLDifference
UBSIUnited Bankshares Inc/Wv1.72%3.47%1.75%
ONBOld National Bancorp/In Common Stock1.96%2.20%0.24%
HOMBHome Bancshares Inc/ar1.33%2.72%1.39%
SLDESlide Insurance Holdings, Inc.0.48%2.11%1.63%
UMBFUmb Financial Corp.1.07%1.39%0.32%
MATXMatson Inc0.73%1.45%0.72%
TNKTeekay Tankers Ltd Common Stock Temp Line0.33%1.72%1.39%
HRMYHarmony Biosciences, Llc0.33%1.57%1.24%
GNTXGentex Corp0.47%1.38%0.91%
PRLBProto Labs Inc0.70%1.13%0.43%

28.5% of AESL is already inside ACSV.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

ACSVAESL

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ACSV or AESL?

ACSV has an expense ratio of 0.49% while AESL charges 0.40%. AESL is the cheaper option, by $9 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between ACSV and AESL?

28.5% of AESL's money is in holdings ACSV also owns. 28.5% of AESL's is in holdings ACSV also owns. They hold 26 positions in common, counted across the 201 positions we hold weights for in ACSV and 126 in AESL.

Which pays a higher dividend, ACSV or AESL?

ACSV yields 1.08% while AESL yields 0.00%, so ACSV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is AESL better than ACSV?

AESL has a lower expense ratio. ACSV is less concentrated, with 17.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 26.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.