ACSV vs IWN
American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF vs iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF
Which is better, ACSV or IWN?
ACSV has been ahead.
IWN has a lower expense ratio. ACSV led over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. IWN is less concentrated, with 5.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 17.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACSV | IWN |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.24%Best |
| AUM | $24M | $13.8B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.08% | 1.55% |
| Holdings | 419 | 1,393 |
| YTD Return | +14.75% | +14.77%Best |
| 1Y Return | +18.36%Best | +17.60% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.07% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +6.58% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.8%Best | 14.3% |
| Top 10 Weight | 17.4% | 5.4%Best |
| Fund Family | American Century ETFs | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Value | Small Cap Value |
| Inception | Oct 14, 2025 | Jul 24, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
ACSV vs IWN growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
ACSV vs IWN Performance
American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF (ACSV) is an ETF from American Century ETFs and iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ACSV returned +18.36% while IWN returned +17.60%. Year to date, ACSV is up 14.75% versus a gain of 14.77% for IWN.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IWN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.3% compared with 13.8% for ACSV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACSV charges 0.49% per year while IWN charges 0.24%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $24 annually, a gap of $25 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACSV currently yields 1.08% against 1.55% for IWN.
Holdings Overlap
56.6% of ACSV's money is in holdings IWN also owns. 13.2% of IWN's money is in holdings ACSV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
92 positions in common, counted across the 201 positions we hold weights for in ACSV and 1,290 in IWN, against full books of 419 and 1,393.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,043 positions for IWN that do not appear in our book for ACSV (81.3% of the fund), and 94 for ACSV that do not appear in IWN (39.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ACSV | Weight in IWN | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ONBOld National Bancorp/In Common Stock | 1.96% | 0.53% | 1.43% |
| GTYGetty Realty Corp | 2.07% | 0.11% | 1.96% |
| UBSIUnited Bankshares Inc/Wv | 1.72% | 0.43% | 1.29% |
| AUBAtlantic Union Bankshares Corp. | 1.71% | 0.37% | 1.34% |
| PFSProvident Financial Services Inc | 1.89% | 0.18% | 1.71% |
| TRNOTerreno Realty Corp | 1.54% | 0.46% | 1.08% |
| PFSIPennymac Financial Services Inc | 1.61% | 0.13% | 1.48% |
| HOMBHome Bancshares Inc/ar | 1.33% | 0.38% | 0.95% |
| UMBFUmb Financial Corp. | 1.07% | 0.60% | 0.47% |
| CRGYCrescent Energ-A | 1.40% | 0.26% | 1.14% |
56.6% of ACSV is already inside IWN.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACSV or IWN?
ACSV has an expense ratio of 0.49% while IWN charges 0.24%. IWN is the cheaper option, by $25 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ACSV or IWN?
Over the past year ACSV returned +18.36% vs +17.60% for IWN, so ACSV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ACSV or IWN?
IWN has been the more volatile fund at 14.3% annualized versus 13.8% for ACSV.
Should I hold both ACSV and IWN?
ACSV and IWN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ACSV and IWN?
56.6% of ACSV's money is in holdings IWN also owns. 13.2% of IWN's is in holdings ACSV also owns. They hold 92 positions in common, counted across the 201 positions we hold weights for in ACSV and 1,290 in IWN.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACSV or IWN?
ACSV yields 1.08% while IWN yields 1.55%, so IWN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IWN better than ACSV?
IWN has a lower expense ratio. ACSV led over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. IWN is less concentrated, with 5.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 17.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.