ACVF vs CGCV
American Conservative Values ETF vs Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF
Which is better, ACVF or CGCV?
Each has led over a different period.
CGCV has a lower expense ratio. ACVF led over 1Y, CGCV over the full window. ACVF is less concentrated, with 28.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACVF | CGCV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.33%Best |
| AUM | $155M | $2.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.49% | 1.59% |
| Holdings | 778 | 146 |
| YTD Return | +11.40%Best | +8.70% |
| 1Y Return | +12.34%Best | +11.37% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.66% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.53% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.7% | 9.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -16.8% | -13.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.3 years | $13,506 | $13,706Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 28.8%Best | 33.0% |
| Fund Family | ACV ETFs | Capital Group (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 28, 2020 | Jun 25, 2024 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 27, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.3 years).
ACVF vs CGCV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.3 years both funds cover.
ACVF vs CGCV Performance
American Conservative Values ETF (ACVF) is an ETF from ACV ETFs and Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF (CGCV) is an ETF from Capital Group (US). Over the past year ACVF returned +12.34% while CGCV returned +11.37%. Year to date, ACVF is up 11.40% versus a gain of 8.70% for CGCV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ACVF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 10.7% compared with 9.9% for CGCV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.8% for ACVF and -13.1% for CGCV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACVF charges 0.75% per year while CGCV charges 0.33%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $33 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACVF currently yields 0.49% against 1.59% for CGCV.
Holdings Overlap
41.2% of ACVF's money is in holdings CGCV also owns. 72.2% of CGCV's money is in holdings ACVF also owns.
Most of CGCV is already inside ACVF. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
55 positions in common, counted across the 387 positions we hold weights for in ACVF and 73 in CGCV, against full books of 778 and 146.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 14 positions for CGCV that do not appear in our book for ACVF (22.6% of the fund), and 318 for ACVF that do not appear in CGCV (58.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ACVF | Weight in CGCV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.34% | 6.20% | 0.86% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.46% | 2.16% | 6.30% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.52% | 4.04% | 1.52% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 2.72% | 3.00% | 0.28% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 1.63% | 3.00% | 1.37% |
| PMPhilip Morris International Inc. | 0.75% | 3.41% | 2.66% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 0.98% | 2.66% | 1.68% |
| XOMExxonmobil Corp. | 1.65% | 1.92% | 0.27% |
| HDHome Depot Inc/The | 1.09% | 1.61% | 0.52% |
| GEGeneral Electric Co. | 0.68% | 1.93% | 1.25% |
72.2% of CGCV is already inside ACVF.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACVF or CGCV?
ACVF has an expense ratio of 0.75% while CGCV charges 0.33%. CGCV is the cheaper option, by $42 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ACVF or CGCV?
Over the past year ACVF returned +12.34% vs +11.37% for CGCV, so ACVF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), ACVF annualized +13.96% vs +14.69% for CGCV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ACVF or CGCV?
ACVF has been the more volatile fund at 10.7% annualized versus 9.9% for CGCV. Worst drawdown: ACVF -16.8% vs CGCV -13.1%.
Should I hold both ACVF and CGCV?
ACVF and CGCV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ACVF and CGCV?
72.2% of CGCV's money is in holdings ACVF also owns. 72.2% of CGCV's is in holdings ACVF also owns. They hold 55 positions in common, counted across the 387 positions we hold weights for in ACVF and 73 in CGCV.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACVF or CGCV?
ACVF yields 0.49% while CGCV yields 1.59%, so CGCV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is CGCV better than ACVF?
CGCV has a lower expense ratio. ACVF led over 1Y, CGCV over the full window. ACVF is less concentrated, with 28.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.