ADME vs AMOM
Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF vs Qraft AI-Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum ETF
Which is better, ADME or AMOM?
AMOM has been ahead.
AMOM has a lower expense ratio. AMOM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. AMOM is less concentrated, with 36.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ADME | AMOM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.75%Best |
| AUM | $313M | $23M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.36% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 167 | 102 |
| YTD Return | +9.94% | +19.96%Best |
| 1Y Return | +10.86% | +21.68%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.81% | +24.92%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.38% | +11.23%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.6%Best | 21.6% |
| Max Drawdown | -23.4%Best | -39.7% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,276 | $17,026Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 40.3% | 36.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Aptus ETFs | QRAFT AI ETFs |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jun 8, 2016 | May 20, 2019 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 21, 2019 to Oct 14, 2026 (7.4 years).
ADME vs AMOM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 7.4 years both funds cover.
ADME vs AMOM Performance
Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (ADME) is an ETF from Aptus ETFs and Qraft AI-Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) is an ETF from QRAFT AI ETFs. Over the past year ADME returned +10.86% while AMOM returned +21.68%. Year to date, ADME is up 9.94% versus a gain of 19.96% for AMOM.
Over three years, ADME compounded at +16.81% per year against +24.92% for AMOM; over five years the annualized figures are +7.38% and +11.23% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, AMOM has the edge at +16.76% annualized vs +9.80%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AMOM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.6% compared with 12.6% for ADME. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.4% for ADME and -39.7% for AMOM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ADME charges 0.79% per year while AMOM charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $75 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ADME currently yields 0.36% against 0.00% for AMOM.
Holdings Overlap
22.9% of ADME's money is in holdings AMOM also owns. 72.8% of AMOM's money is in holdings ADME also owns.
Most of AMOM is already inside ADME. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
30 positions in common, counted across the 164 positions we hold weights for in ADME and 50 in AMOM, against full books of 167 and 102.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 20 positions for AMOM that do not appear in our book for ADME (26.7% of the fund), and 133 for ADME that do not appear in AMOM (75.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ADME | Weight in AMOM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 7.85% | 8.55% | 0.70% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.47% | 3.89% | 1.42% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.64% | 3.23% | 1.59% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc. | 1.32% | 3.12% | 1.80% |
| CATCaterpillar, Inc. | 0.95% | 3.23% | 2.28% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 0.64% | 3.29% | 2.65% |
| PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc | 0.60% | 3.12% | 2.52% |
| CRWDCrowdstrike Ho-a | 0.61% | 2.82% | 2.21% |
| GEGeneral Electric Co. | 0.66% | 2.76% | 2.10% |
| PANWPalo Alto Networks Inc. | 0.49% | 2.93% | 2.44% |
72.8% of AMOM is already inside ADME.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ADME or AMOM?
ADME has an expense ratio of 0.79% while AMOM charges 0.75%. AMOM is the cheaper option, by $4 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ADME or AMOM?
Over the past year ADME returned +10.86% vs +21.68% for AMOM, so AMOM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), ADME annualized +9.80% vs +16.76% for AMOM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ADME or AMOM?
AMOM has been the more volatile fund at 21.6% annualized versus 12.6% for ADME. Worst drawdown: ADME -23.4% vs AMOM -39.7%.
Should I hold both ADME and AMOM?
ADME and AMOM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ADME and AMOM?
72.8% of AMOM's money is in holdings ADME also owns. 72.8% of AMOM's is in holdings ADME also owns. They hold 30 positions in common, counted across the 164 positions we hold weights for in ADME and 50 in AMOM.
Which pays a higher dividend, ADME or AMOM?
ADME yields 0.36% while AMOM yields 0.00%, so ADME currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is AMOM better than ADME?
AMOM has a lower expense ratio. AMOM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. AMOM is less concentrated, with 36.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.