AESB vs FSCC

AESB vs FSCC

Which is better, AESB or FSCC?

FSCC costs less.

FSCC has a lower expense ratio. FSCC is less concentrated, with 11.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 22.6%.

Lower Fees: FSCCLess Concentrated: FSCC

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricAESBFSCC
Expense Ratio0.38%0.36%Best
AUM$2M$427M
Dividend Yield0.00%0.24%
Holdings331622
YTD Return-4.24%+10.38%Best
1Y Return-+12.30%
Top 10 Weight22.6%11.8%Best
Fund FamilyHarbor FundsFederated Hermes
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleSmall Cap BlendSmall Cap Blend
InceptionAug 26, 2026Jul 30, 2024

Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

AESB vs FSCC growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare AESB against instead:AESB vs SPYAESB vs QQQAESB vs VOOAESB vs VTIFSCC against:FSCC vs VXUS

AESB vs FSCC Performance

Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Core ETF (AESB) is an ETF from Harbor Funds and Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF (FSCC) is an ETF from Federated Hermes. Year to date, AESB is down 4.24% versus a gain of 10.38% for FSCC.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

AESB charges 0.38% per year while FSCC charges 0.36%. On a $10,000 position that is $38 vs $36 annually, a gap of $2 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AESB currently yields 0.00% against 0.24% for FSCC.

Holdings Overlap

AESB already in FSCC26.1%
FSCC already in AESB14.2%

26.1% of AESB's money is in holdings FSCC also owns. 14.2% of FSCC's money is in holdings AESB also owns.

AESB and FSCC share little of their money.

39 positions in common, counted across the 167 positions we hold weights for in AESB and 310 in FSCC, against full books of 331 and 622.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 254 positions for FSCC that do not appear in our book for AESB (82.5% of the fund), and 116 for AESB that do not appear in FSCC (64.4%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in AESBWeight in FSCCDifference
SLDESlide Insurance Holdings, Inc.1.97%1.11%0.86%
BFHBread Financial Holdings, Inc.2.94%0.08%2.86%
OFG:PROfg Bancorp Common Stock1.63%0.56%1.07%
VCTRVictory Receivables Corp1.66%0.36%1.30%
HRMYHarmony Biosciences, Llc1.47%0.37%1.10%
HNGEHinge Health Inc0.91%0.82%0.09%
INSWInternational Seaways, Inc.1.13%0.49%0.64%
TWSTTwist Bioscience Corp.0.94%0.53%0.41%
SSRMSsr Mining Inc0.96%0.37%0.59%
INDV:MBIndivior Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Ordinary Shares0.24%1.02%0.78%

26.1% of AESB is already inside FSCC.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

AESBFSCC

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, AESB or FSCC?

AESB has an expense ratio of 0.38% while FSCC charges 0.36%. FSCC is the cheaper option, by $2 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between AESB and FSCC?

26.1% of AESB's money is in holdings FSCC also owns. 14.2% of FSCC's is in holdings AESB also owns. They hold 39 positions in common, counted across the 167 positions we hold weights for in AESB and 310 in FSCC.

Which pays a higher dividend, AESB or FSCC?

AESB yields 0.00% while FSCC yields 0.24%, so FSCC currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is FSCC better than AESB?

FSCC has a lower expense ratio. FSCC is less concentrated, with 11.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 22.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.