AESB vs GSC
Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Core ETF vs Goldman Sachs Small Cap Equity ETF
Which is better, AESB or GSC?
AESB costs less.
AESB has a lower expense ratio. GSC is less concentrated, with 16.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 22.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AESB | GSC |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.38%Best | 0.75% |
| AUM | $2M | $286M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.22% |
| Holdings | 331 | 197 |
| YTD Return | -4.24% | +10.48%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +14.01% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.86% |
| Top 10 Weight | 22.6% | 16.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Harbor Funds | Goldman Sachs Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Blend | Small Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 26, 2026 | Oct 3, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
AESB vs GSC growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
AESB vs GSC Performance
Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Core ETF (AESB) is an ETF from Harbor Funds and Goldman Sachs Small Cap Equity ETF (GSC) is an ETF from Goldman Sachs Asset Management. Year to date, AESB is down 4.24% versus a gain of 10.48% for GSC.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AESB charges 0.38% per year while GSC charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $38 vs $75 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AESB currently yields 0.00% against 0.22% for GSC.
Holdings Overlap
4.0% of AESB's money is in holdings GSC also owns. 7.5% of GSC's money is in holdings AESB also owns.
GSC and AESB share little of their money.
7 positions in common, counted across the 167 positions we hold weights for in AESB and 98 in GSC, against full books of 331 and 197.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 84 positions for GSC that do not appear in our book for AESB (86.8% of the fund), and 145 for AESB that do not appear in GSC (84.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of AESB and GSC you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AESB or GSC?
AESB has an expense ratio of 0.38% while GSC charges 0.75%. AESB is the cheaper option, by $37 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between AESB and GSC?
7.5% of GSC's money is in holdings AESB also owns. 7.5% of GSC's is in holdings AESB also owns. They hold 7 positions in common, counted across the 167 positions we hold weights for in AESB and 98 in GSC.
Which pays a higher dividend, AESB or GSC?
AESB yields 0.00% while GSC yields 0.22%, so GSC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is GSC better than AESB?
AESB has a lower expense ratio. GSC is less concentrated, with 16.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 22.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.