AESB vs OMFS
Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Core ETF vs Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF
Which is better, AESB or OMFS?
AESB costs less.
AESB has a lower expense ratio. OMFS is less concentrated, with 12.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 22.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AESB | OMFS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.38%Best | 0.39% |
| AUM | $2M | $264M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.30% |
| Holdings | 331 | 2,228 |
| YTD Return | -4.24% | +8.89%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +10.32% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.55% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +4.67% |
| Top 10 Weight | 22.6% | 12.0%Best |
| Fund Family | Harbor Funds | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Blend | Small Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 26, 2026 | Nov 8, 2017 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
AESB vs OMFS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
AESB vs OMFS Performance
Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Core ETF (AESB) is an ETF from Harbor Funds and Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFS) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, AESB is down 4.24% versus a gain of 8.89% for OMFS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AESB charges 0.38% per year while OMFS charges 0.39%. On a $10,000 position that is $38 vs $39 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AESB currently yields 0.00% against 1.30% for OMFS.
Holdings Overlap
69.8% of AESB's money is in holdings OMFS also owns. 22.3% of OMFS's money is in holdings AESB also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
107 positions in common, counted across the 167 positions we hold weights for in AESB and 933 in OMFS, against full books of 331 and 2,228.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 784 positions for OMFS that do not appear in our book for AESB (72.0% of the fund), and 53 for AESB that do not appear in OMFS (23.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in AESB | Weight in OMFS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| APLEApple Hospitality Reit Inc | 3.11% | 0.29% | 2.82% |
| BFHBread Financial Holdings, Inc. | 2.94% | 0.20% | 2.74% |
| CATYCathay Generalbancorp | 2.49% | 0.17% | 2.32% |
| RAMPLiveramp Holdings Inc | 2.42% | 0.17% | 2.25% |
| VCTRVictory Receivables Corp | 1.66% | 0.92% | 0.74% |
| SSRMSsr Mining Inc | 0.96% | 1.42% | 0.46% |
| SLDESlide Insurance Holdings, Inc. | 1.97% | 0.16% | 1.81% |
| OFG:PROfg Bancorp Common Stock | 1.63% | 0.08% | 1.55% |
| EATBrinker Intl Inc | 0.55% | 1.15% | 0.60% |
| ENVAEnova International Inc. (usd) | 1.26% | 0.42% | 0.84% |
69.8% of AESB is already inside OMFS.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AESB or OMFS?
AESB has an expense ratio of 0.38% while OMFS charges 0.39%. AESB is the cheaper option, by $1 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between AESB and OMFS?
69.8% of AESB's money is in holdings OMFS also owns. 22.3% of OMFS's is in holdings AESB also owns. They hold 107 positions in common, counted across the 167 positions we hold weights for in AESB and 933 in OMFS.
Which pays a higher dividend, AESB or OMFS?
AESB yields 0.00% while OMFS yields 1.30%, so OMFS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is OMFS better than AESB?
AESB has a lower expense ratio. OMFS is less concentrated, with 12.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 22.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.