AESB vs SCDV
Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Core ETF vs Bahl & Gaynor Small Cap Dividend ETF
Which is better, AESB or SCDV?
AESB costs less.
AESB has a lower expense ratio. AESB is less concentrated, with 22.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AESB | SCDV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.38%Best | 0.70% |
| AUM | $2M | $148M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.43% |
| Holdings | 331 | 40 |
| YTD Return | -4.24% | +6.54%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +3.53% |
| Top 10 Weight | 22.6%Best | 48.0% |
| Fund Family | Harbor Funds | Bahl & Gaynor |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Blend | Small Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 26, 2026 | Dec 11, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
AESB vs SCDV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
AESB vs SCDV Performance
Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Core ETF (AESB) is an ETF from Harbor Funds and Bahl & Gaynor Small Cap Dividend ETF (SCDV) is an ETF from Bahl & Gaynor. Year to date, AESB is down 4.24% versus a gain of 6.54% for SCDV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AESB charges 0.38% per year while SCDV charges 0.70%. On a $10,000 position that is $38 vs $70 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AESB currently yields 0.00% against 0.43% for SCDV.
Holdings Overlap
2.0% of AESB's money is in holdings SCDV also owns. 6.4% of SCDV's money is in holdings AESB also owns.
SCDV and AESB share little of their money.
2 positions in common, counted across the 167 positions we hold weights for in AESB and 36 in SCDV, against full books of 331 and 40.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 33 positions for SCDV that do not appear in our book for AESB (89.7% of the fund), and 150 for AESB that do not appear in SCDV (86.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of AESB and SCDV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AESB or SCDV?
AESB has an expense ratio of 0.38% while SCDV charges 0.70%. AESB is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between AESB and SCDV?
6.4% of SCDV's money is in holdings AESB also owns. 6.4% of SCDV's is in holdings AESB also owns. They hold 2 positions in common, counted across the 167 positions we hold weights for in AESB and 36 in SCDV.
Which pays a higher dividend, AESB or SCDV?
AESB yields 0.00% while SCDV yields 0.43%, so SCDV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCDV better than AESB?
AESB has a lower expense ratio. AESB is less concentrated, with 22.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.