AFGR vs BDVG
First Trust Active Factor Large Cap Growth ETF vs iMGP Berkshire Dividend Growth ETF
Which is better, AFGR or BDVG?
Each has led over a different period.
BDVG has a lower expense ratio. AFGR led over 3Y and the full window, BDVG over 1Y. BDVG is less concentrated, with 43.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AFGR | BDVG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.55%Best |
| AUM | $93M | - |
| Dividend Yield | 0.01% | 1.38% |
| Holdings | 91 | 85 |
| YTD Return | +7.06% | +17.47%Best |
| 1Y Return | +5.34% | +20.24%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.98%Best | +17.49% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.15% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.4% | 10.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -26.6% | -14.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.3 years | $17,480Best | $15,499 |
| Top 10 Weight | 47.0% | 43.4%Best |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | iMGP Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jul 20, 2020 | Jun 29, 2023 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 30, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.3 years).
AFGR vs BDVG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.3 years both funds cover.
AFGR vs BDVG Performance
First Trust Active Factor Large Cap Growth ETF (AFGR) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and iMGP Berkshire Dividend Growth ETF (BDVG) is an ETF from iMGP Funds. Over the past year AFGR returned +5.34% while BDVG returned +20.24%. Year to date, AFGR is up 7.06% versus a gain of 17.47% for BDVG.
Over three years, AFGR compounded at +21.98% per year against +17.49% for BDVG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AFGR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.4% compared with 10.8% for BDVG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -26.6% for AFGR and -14.5% for BDVG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.59. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AFGR charges 0.65% per year while BDVG charges 0.55%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $55 annually, a gap of $10 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AFGR currently yields 0.01% against 1.38% for BDVG.
Holdings Overlap
11.8% of AFGR's money is in holdings BDVG also owns. 22.0% of BDVG's money is in holdings AFGR also owns.
BDVG and AFGR share little of their money.
5 positions in common, counted across the 90 positions we hold weights for in AFGR and 41 in BDVG, against full books of 91 and 85.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 33 positions for BDVG that do not appear in our book for AFGR (72.2% of the fund), and 84 for AFGR that do not appear in BDVG (87.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
22.0% of BDVG is already inside AFGR.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AFGR or BDVG?
AFGR has an expense ratio of 0.65% while BDVG charges 0.55%. BDVG is the cheaper option, by $10 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, AFGR or BDVG?
Over the past year AFGR returned +5.34% vs +20.24% for BDVG, so BDVG leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, AFGR or BDVG?
AFGR has been the more volatile fund at 18.4% annualized versus 10.8% for BDVG. Worst drawdown: AFGR -26.6% vs BDVG -14.5%.
Should I hold both AFGR and BDVG?
AFGR and BDVG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.59, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between AFGR and BDVG?
22.0% of BDVG's money is in holdings AFGR also owns. 22.0% of BDVG's is in holdings AFGR also owns. They hold 5 positions in common, counted across the 90 positions we hold weights for in AFGR and 41 in BDVG.
Which pays a higher dividend, AFGR or BDVG?
AFGR yields 0.01% while BDVG yields 1.38%, so BDVG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is BDVG better than AFGR?
BDVG has a lower expense ratio. AFGR led over 3Y and the full window, BDVG over 1Y. BDVG is less concentrated, with 43.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.