AFGR vs GSGO
First Trust Active Factor Large Cap Growth ETF vs Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF
Which is better, AFGR or GSGO?
GSGO has been ahead.
GSGO has a lower expense ratio. GSGO led over 1Y. AFGR is less concentrated, with 47.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 53.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AFGR | GSGO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.45%Best |
| AUM | $93M | $192M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.01% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 91 | 54 |
| YTD Return | +7.06% | +11.08%Best |
| 1Y Return | +5.34% | +12.54%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.98% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.15% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 47.0%Best | 53.5% |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Goldman Sachs Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jul 20, 2020 | May 24, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
AFGR vs GSGO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
AFGR vs GSGO Performance
First Trust Active Factor Large Cap Growth ETF (AFGR) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF (GSGO) is an ETF from Goldman Sachs Asset Management. Over the past year AFGR returned +5.34% while GSGO returned +12.54%. Year to date, AFGR is up 7.06% versus a gain of 11.08% for GSGO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AFGR charges 0.65% per year while GSGO charges 0.45%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $45 annually, a gap of $20 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AFGR currently yields 0.01% against 0.00% for GSGO.
Holdings Overlap
57.0% of AFGR's money is in holdings GSGO also owns. 67.3% of GSGO's money is in holdings AFGR also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
24 positions in common, counted across the 90 positions we hold weights for in AFGR and 53 in GSGO, against full books of 91 and 54.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 26 positions for GSGO that do not appear in our book for AFGR (28.7% of the fund), and 65 for AFGR that do not appear in GSGO (42.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in AFGR | Weight in GSGO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 10.92% | 12.73% | 1.81% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 10.83% | 8.85% | 1.98% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 4.43% | 7.03% | 2.60% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.98% | 5.19% | 2.21% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 2.27% | 4.53% | 2.26% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 4.39% | 2.16% | 2.23% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 2.14% | 4.30% | 2.16% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.08% | 2.56% | 0.52% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.94% | 1.02% | 2.92% |
| PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc | 1.95% | 2.46% | 0.51% |
67.3% of GSGO is already inside AFGR.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AFGR or GSGO?
AFGR has an expense ratio of 0.65% while GSGO charges 0.45%. GSGO is the cheaper option, by $20 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, AFGR or GSGO?
Over the past year AFGR returned +5.34% vs +12.54% for GSGO, so GSGO leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between AFGR and GSGO?
67.3% of GSGO's money is in holdings AFGR also owns. 67.3% of GSGO's is in holdings AFGR also owns. They hold 24 positions in common, counted across the 90 positions we hold weights for in AFGR and 53 in GSGO.
Which pays a higher dividend, AFGR or GSGO?
AFGR yields 0.01% while GSGO yields 0.00%, so AFGR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is GSGO better than AFGR?
GSGO has a lower expense ratio. GSGO led over 1Y. AFGR is less concentrated, with 47.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 53.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.