AGRW vs TLG

AGRW vs TLG

Which is better, AGRW or TLG?

AGRW has been ahead.

AGRW has a lower expense ratio. AGRW led over 1Y. AGRW is less concentrated, with 53.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 63.5%.

Lower Fees: AGRWHigher Returns (1Y): AGRWLess Concentrated: AGRW

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricAGRWTLG
Expense Ratio0.35%Best0.67%
AUM$118M$110M
Dividend Yield0.11%0.00%
Holdings5172
YTD Return+9.38%+13.31%Best
1Y Return+10.78%-
Top 10 Weight53.5%Best63.5%
Fund FamilyAllspring Global InvestmentsTouchstone Investments
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Growth
InceptionMar 26, 2025Mar 16, 2026

Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

AGRW vs TLG growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare AGRW against instead:AGRW vs SPYAGRW vs QQQAGRW vs VOOAGRW vs VTITLG against:TLG vs VXUS

AGRW vs TLG Performance

Allspring LT Large Growth ETF (AGRW) is an ETF from Allspring Global Investments and Touchstone Large Company Growth ETF (TLG) is an ETF from Touchstone Investments. Year to date, AGRW is up 9.38% versus a gain of 13.31% for TLG.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

AGRW charges 0.35% per year while TLG charges 0.67%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $67 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AGRW currently yields 0.11% against 0.00% for TLG.

Holdings Overlap

AGRW already in TLG48.3%
TLG already in AGRW61.1%

48.3% of AGRW's money is in holdings TLG also owns. 61.1% of TLG's money is in holdings AGRW also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

15 positions in common, counted across the 47 positions we hold weights for in AGRW and 35 in TLG, against full books of 51 and 72.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 17 positions for TLG that do not appear in our book for AGRW (35.1% of the fund), and 30 for AGRW that do not appear in TLG (48.9%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in AGRWWeight in TLGDifference
NVDANvidia Corp15.57%16.25%0.68%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp4.18%7.00%2.82%
AVGOBroadcom Inc4.29%5.90%1.61%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc3.95%6.03%2.08%
METAMeta Platforms Inc4.28%5.19%0.91%
ANETArista Networks Inc Common Stock2.63%4.54%1.91%
GEVGe Vernova, Inc.2.63%3.57%0.94%
APHAmphenol Corp. Class A1.75%2.50%0.75%
DXCMDexcom Inc.1.30%2.00%0.70%
NOWServicenow, Inc.1.96%1.31%0.65%

61.1% of TLG is already inside AGRW.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

AGRWTLG

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, AGRW or TLG?

AGRW has an expense ratio of 0.35% while TLG charges 0.67%. AGRW is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between AGRW and TLG?

61.1% of TLG's money is in holdings AGRW also owns. 61.1% of TLG's is in holdings AGRW also owns. They hold 15 positions in common, counted across the 47 positions we hold weights for in AGRW and 35 in TLG.

Which pays a higher dividend, AGRW or TLG?

AGRW yields 0.11% while TLG yields 0.00%, so AGRW currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is TLG better than AGRW?

AGRW has a lower expense ratio. AGRW led over 1Y. AGRW is less concentrated, with 53.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 63.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.