AIEQ vs AMOM
Amplify AI Powered Equity ETF vs Qraft AI-Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum ETF
Which is better, AIEQ or AMOM?
AMOM has been ahead.
AMOM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. AMOM is less concentrated, with 36.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AIEQ | AMOM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75%Tie | 0.75%Tie |
| AUM | $116M | $23M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.40% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 326 | 102 |
| YTD Return | +9.72% | +19.96%Best |
| 1Y Return | +10.97% | +21.68%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.64% | +24.92%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.86% | +11.23%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.3%Best | 21.6% |
| Max Drawdown | -39.0%Best | -39.7% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $12,085 | $17,026Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 41.1% | 36.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Amplify ETFs | QRAFT AI ETFs |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Oct 17, 2017 | May 20, 2019 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 21, 2019 to Oct 14, 2026 (7.4 years).
AIEQ vs AMOM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 7.4 years both funds cover.
AIEQ vs AMOM Performance
Amplify AI Powered Equity ETF (AIEQ) is an ETF from Amplify ETFs and Qraft AI-Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) is an ETF from QRAFT AI ETFs. Over the past year AIEQ returned +10.97% while AMOM returned +21.68%. Year to date, AIEQ is up 9.72% versus a gain of 19.96% for AMOM.
Over three years, AIEQ compounded at +18.64% per year against +24.92% for AMOM; over five years the annualized figures are +3.86% and +11.23% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, AMOM has the edge at +16.76% annualized vs +9.76%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AMOM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.6% compared with 21.3% for AIEQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -39.0% for AIEQ and -39.7% for AMOM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AIEQ charges 0.75% per year while AMOM charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $75 annually. On income, AIEQ currently yields 0.40% against 0.00% for AMOM.
Holdings Overlap
24.5% of AIEQ's money is in holdings AMOM also owns. 52.6% of AMOM's money is in holdings AIEQ also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
23 positions in common, counted across the 163 positions we hold weights for in AIEQ and 50 in AMOM, against full books of 326 and 102.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 27 positions for AMOM that do not appear in our book for AIEQ (47.0% of the fund), and 136 for AIEQ that do not appear in AMOM (74.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in AIEQ | Weight in AMOM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 9.13% | 3.89% | 5.24% |
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 3.99% | 8.55% | 4.56% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.29% | 3.23% | 1.94% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc. | 1.19% | 3.12% | 1.93% |
| PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc | 0.51% | 3.12% | 2.61% |
| APPAppLovin Corp. Com Cl A | 1.97% | 1.45% | 0.52% |
| CRWDCrowdstrike Ho-a | 0.32% | 2.82% | 2.50% |
| FFIVF5 Networks Inc. | 1.93% | 1.20% | 0.73% |
| HWMHowmet Aerospace Inc. | 1.35% | 1.63% | 0.28% |
| PANWPalo Alto Networks Inc. | 0.05% | 2.93% | 2.88% |
52.6% of AMOM is already inside AIEQ.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AIEQ or AMOM?
AIEQ has an expense ratio of 0.75% while AMOM charges 0.75%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.
Which performed better, AIEQ or AMOM?
Over the past year AIEQ returned +10.97% vs +21.68% for AMOM, so AMOM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), AIEQ annualized +9.76% vs +16.76% for AMOM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, AIEQ or AMOM?
AMOM has been the more volatile fund at 21.6% annualized versus 21.3% for AIEQ. Worst drawdown: AIEQ -39.0% vs AMOM -39.7%.
Should I hold both AIEQ and AMOM?
AIEQ and AMOM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between AIEQ and AMOM?
52.6% of AMOM's money is in holdings AIEQ also owns. 52.6% of AMOM's is in holdings AIEQ also owns. They hold 23 positions in common, counted across the 163 positions we hold weights for in AIEQ and 50 in AMOM.
Which pays a higher dividend, AIEQ or AMOM?
AIEQ yields 0.40% while AMOM yields 0.00%, so AIEQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is AMOM better than AIEQ?
AMOM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. AMOM is less concentrated, with 36.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.