AIEQ vs BCTK

AIEQ vs BCTK

Which is better, AIEQ or BCTK?

BCTK has been ahead.

BCTK led over 1Y. AIEQ is less concentrated, with 41.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.9%.

Lower Fees: TiedHigher Returns (1Y): BCTKLess Concentrated: AIEQ

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricAIEQBCTK
Expense Ratio0.75%Tie0.75%Tie
AUM$116M-
Dividend Yield0.40%0.16%
Holdings32640
YTD Return+9.72%+17.64%Best
1Y Return+10.97%-
3Y Return (annualized)+18.64%-
5Y Return (annualized)+3.86%-
Top 10 Weight41.1%Best57.9%
Fund FamilyAmplify ETFsBaron Funds
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Growth
InceptionOct 17, 2017Dec 12, 2025

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

AIEQ vs BCTK growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare AIEQ against instead:AIEQ vs SPYAIEQ vs QQQAIEQ vs VOOAIEQ vs VTIBCTK against:BCTK vs VXUS

AIEQ vs BCTK Performance

Amplify AI Powered Equity ETF (AIEQ) is an ETF from Amplify ETFs and Baron Technology ETF (BCTK) is an ETF from Baron Funds. Year to date, AIEQ is up 9.72% versus a gain of 17.64% for BCTK.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

AIEQ charges 0.75% per year while BCTK charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $75 annually. On income, AIEQ currently yields 0.40% against 0.16% for BCTK.

Holdings Overlap

AIEQ already in BCTK22.3%
BCTK already in AIEQ42.0%

22.3% of AIEQ's money is in holdings BCTK also owns. 42.0% of BCTK's money is in holdings AIEQ also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

13 positions in common, counted across the 163 positions we hold weights for in AIEQ and 39 in BCTK, against full books of 326 and 40.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 19 positions for BCTK that do not appear in our book for AIEQ (41.3% of the fund), and 146 for AIEQ that do not appear in BCTK (77.1%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in AIEQWeight in BCTKDifference
AVGOBroadcom Inc9.13%5.02%4.11%
NVDANvidia Corp3.99%7.12%3.13%
GOOGAlphabet Inc. C2.76%6.29%3.53%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.1.29%4.78%3.49%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc1.27%4.58%3.31%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc1.19%3.73%2.54%
COHRCoherent, Inc0.17%3.07%2.90%
METAMeta Platforms Inc0.99%1.13%0.14%
LITELumentum Holdings Inc0.08%1.97%1.89%
WELLWelltower, Inc.1.03%0.65%0.38%

42.0% of BCTK is already inside AIEQ.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

AIEQBCTK

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, AIEQ or BCTK?

AIEQ has an expense ratio of 0.75% while BCTK charges 0.75%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.

What is the holdings overlap between AIEQ and BCTK?

42.0% of BCTK's money is in holdings AIEQ also owns. 42.0% of BCTK's is in holdings AIEQ also owns. They hold 13 positions in common, counted across the 163 positions we hold weights for in AIEQ and 39 in BCTK.

Which pays a higher dividend, AIEQ or BCTK?

AIEQ yields 0.40% while BCTK yields 0.16%, so AIEQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is BCTK better than AIEQ?

BCTK led over 1Y. AIEQ is less concentrated, with 41.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.