AIEQ vs GQGU
Amplify AI Powered Equity ETF vs GQG US Equity ETF
Which is better, AIEQ or GQGU?
AIEQ has been ahead.
GQGU has a lower expense ratio. AIEQ led over 1Y and the full window. AIEQ is less concentrated, with 41.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AIEQ | GQGU |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.49%Best |
| AUM | $116M | $584M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.40% | 0.95% |
| Holdings | 326 | 77 |
| YTD Return | +9.72%Best | +5.40% |
| 1Y Return | +10.97%Best | +3.28% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.64% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.86% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.4% | 11.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -9.1% | -8.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.3 years | $11,735Best | $10,428 |
| Top 10 Weight | 41.1%Best | 57.2% |
| Fund Family | Amplify ETFs | GQG Partners LLC |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Oct 17, 2017 | Jul 31, 2019 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 14, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.3 years).
AIEQ vs GQGU growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.3 years both funds cover.
AIEQ vs GQGU Performance
Amplify AI Powered Equity ETF (AIEQ) is an ETF from Amplify ETFs and GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU) is an ETF from GQG Partners LLC. Over the past year AIEQ returned +10.97% while GQGU returned +3.28%. Year to date, AIEQ is up 9.72% versus a gain of 5.40% for GQGU.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AIEQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.4% compared with 11.8% for GQGU. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.1% for AIEQ and -8.4% for GQGU. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.12. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AIEQ charges 0.75% per year while GQGU charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $49 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AIEQ currently yields 0.40% against 0.95% for GQGU.
Holdings Overlap
26.1% of AIEQ's money is in holdings GQGU also owns. 61.2% of GQGU's money is in holdings AIEQ also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
16 positions in common, counted across the 163 positions we hold weights for in AIEQ and 38 in GQGU, against full books of 326 and 77.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 20 positions for GQGU that do not appear in our book for AIEQ (35.8% of the fund), and 143 for AIEQ that do not appear in GQGU (73.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in AIEQ | Weight in GQGU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 3.99% | 9.37% | 5.38% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 9.13% | 2.56% | 6.57% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 2.18% | 8.16% | 5.98% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 2.76% | 7.25% | 4.49% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 1.24% | 7.83% | 6.59% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 1.27% | 6.76% | 5.49% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.29% | 4.08% | 2.79% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 0.99% | 1.68% | 0.69% |
| PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc | 0.51% | 2.10% | 1.59% |
| UNPUnion Pacific Corp | 0.05% | 2.47% | 2.42% |
61.2% of GQGU is already inside AIEQ.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AIEQ or GQGU?
AIEQ has an expense ratio of 0.75% while GQGU charges 0.49%. GQGU is the cheaper option, by $26 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, AIEQ or GQGU?
Over the past year AIEQ returned +10.97% vs +3.28% for GQGU, so AIEQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), AIEQ annualized +13.10% vs +3.28% for GQGU. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, AIEQ or GQGU?
AIEQ has been the more volatile fund at 12.4% annualized versus 11.8% for GQGU. Worst drawdown: AIEQ -9.1% vs GQGU -8.4%.
Should I hold both AIEQ and GQGU?
AIEQ and GQGU have a monthly-return correlation of -0.12, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between AIEQ and GQGU?
61.2% of GQGU's money is in holdings AIEQ also owns. 61.2% of GQGU's is in holdings AIEQ also owns. They hold 16 positions in common, counted across the 163 positions we hold weights for in AIEQ and 38 in GQGU.
Which pays a higher dividend, AIEQ or GQGU?
AIEQ yields 0.40% while GQGU yields 0.95%, so GQGU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is GQGU better than AIEQ?
GQGU has a lower expense ratio. AIEQ led over 1Y and the full window. AIEQ is less concentrated, with 41.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.