AIEQ vs KOOL
Amplify AI Powered Equity ETF vs North Shore Equity Rotation ETF
Which is better, AIEQ or KOOL?
KOOL has been ahead.
AIEQ has a lower expense ratio. KOOL led over 1Y and the full window. AIEQ is less concentrated, with 41.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AIEQ | KOOL |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75%Best | 0.93% |
| AUM | $116M | $60M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.40% | 0.43% |
| Holdings | 326 | 42 |
| YTD Return | +9.72% | +15.54%Best |
| 1Y Return | +10.97% | +16.89%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.64% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.86% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.1% | 12.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -24.2% | -20.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.5 years | $13,946 | $14,826Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 41.1%Best | 42.8% |
| Fund Family | Amplify ETFs | North Shore Indices |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Oct 17, 2017 | Apr 1, 2024 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 2, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.5 years).
AIEQ vs KOOL growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.5 years both funds cover.
AIEQ vs KOOL Performance
Amplify AI Powered Equity ETF (AIEQ) is an ETF from Amplify ETFs and North Shore Equity Rotation ETF (KOOL) is an ETF from North Shore Indices. Over the past year AIEQ returned +10.97% while KOOL returned +16.89%. Year to date, AIEQ is up 9.72% versus a gain of 15.54% for KOOL.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AIEQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 12.0% for KOOL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.2% for AIEQ and -20.6% for KOOL. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AIEQ charges 0.75% per year while KOOL charges 0.93%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $93 annually, a gap of $18 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AIEQ currently yields 0.40% against 0.43% for KOOL.
Holdings Overlap
27.1% of AIEQ's money is in holdings KOOL also owns. 45.2% of KOOL's money is in holdings AIEQ also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
16 positions in common, counted across the 163 positions we hold weights for in AIEQ and 44 in KOOL, against full books of 326 and 42.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 24 positions for KOOL that do not appear in our book for AIEQ (47.9% of the fund), and 143 for AIEQ that do not appear in KOOL (72.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in AIEQ | Weight in KOOL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 9.13% | 1.97% | 7.16% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 3.99% | 5.78% | 1.79% |
| GEVGe Vernova, Inc. | 3.80% | 3.00% | 0.80% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 1.27% | 4.34% | 3.07% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 1.24% | 4.31% | 3.07% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 2.18% | 3.11% | 0.93% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 1.49% | 3.65% | 2.16% |
| FCXFreeport-mcmoran Copper & Gold Inc. | 1.97% | 2.72% | 0.75% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 0.99% | 3.20% | 2.21% |
| VLOValero Energy | 0.05% | 3.34% | 3.29% |
45.2% of KOOL is already inside AIEQ.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AIEQ or KOOL?
AIEQ has an expense ratio of 0.75% while KOOL charges 0.93%. AIEQ is the cheaper option, by $18 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, AIEQ or KOOL?
Over the past year AIEQ returned +10.97% vs +16.89% for KOOL, so KOOL leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, AIEQ or KOOL?
AIEQ has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 12.0% for KOOL. Worst drawdown: AIEQ -24.2% vs KOOL -20.6%.
Should I hold both AIEQ and KOOL?
AIEQ and KOOL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between AIEQ and KOOL?
45.2% of KOOL's money is in holdings AIEQ also owns. 45.2% of KOOL's is in holdings AIEQ also owns. They hold 16 positions in common, counted across the 163 positions we hold weights for in AIEQ and 44 in KOOL.
Which pays a higher dividend, AIEQ or KOOL?
AIEQ yields 0.40% while KOOL yields 0.43%, so KOOL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is KOOL better than AIEQ?
AIEQ has a lower expense ratio. KOOL led over 1Y and the full window. AIEQ is less concentrated, with 41.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.