AIEQ vs MTAW

AIEQ vs MTAW

Which is better, AIEQ or MTAW?

MTAW costs less.

MTAW has a lower expense ratio. AIEQ is less concentrated, with 41.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 54.5%.

Lower Fees: MTAWLess Concentrated: AIEQ

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricAIEQMTAW
Expense Ratio0.75%0.59%Best
AUM$116M$2M
Dividend Yield0.40%0.00%
Holdings32625
YTD Return+9.72%Best-1.65%
1Y Return+10.97%-
3Y Return (annualized)+18.64%-
5Y Return (annualized)+3.86%-
Top 10 Weight41.1%Best54.5%
Fund FamilyAmplify ETFsHarbor Funds
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Growth
InceptionOct 17, 2017Aug 12, 2026

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

AIEQ vs MTAW growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare AIEQ against instead:AIEQ vs SPYAIEQ vs QQQAIEQ vs VOOAIEQ vs VTIMTAW against:MTAW vs VXUS

AIEQ vs MTAW Performance

Amplify AI Powered Equity ETF (AIEQ) is an ETF from Amplify ETFs and Meta AI Lab Ecosystem ETF (MTAW) is an ETF from Harbor Funds. Year to date, AIEQ is up 9.72% versus a loss of 1.65% for MTAW.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

AIEQ charges 0.75% per year while MTAW charges 0.59%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $59 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AIEQ currently yields 0.40% against 0.00% for MTAW.

Holdings Overlap

AIEQ already in MTAW18.2%
MTAW already in AIEQ40.5%

18.2% of AIEQ's money is in holdings MTAW also owns. 40.5% of MTAW's money is in holdings AIEQ also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

8 positions in common, counted across the 163 positions we hold weights for in AIEQ and 25 in MTAW, against full books of 326 and 25.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 12 positions for MTAW that do not appear in our book for AIEQ (39.2% of the fund), and 151 for AIEQ that do not appear in MTAW (81.2%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in AIEQWeight in MTAWDifference
METAMeta Platforms Inc0.99%19.11%18.12%
AVGOBroadcom Inc9.13%2.92%6.21%
NVDANvidia Corp3.99%3.50%0.49%
GOOGAlphabet Inc. C2.76%3.17%0.41%
ORCLOracle Corp - Common0.05%4.01%3.96%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc1.19%2.73%1.54%
QCOMQualcomm Inc.0.05%2.66%2.61%
SOSouthern Co.0.05%2.42%2.37%

40.5% of MTAW is already inside AIEQ.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

AIEQMTAW

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, AIEQ or MTAW?

AIEQ has an expense ratio of 0.75% while MTAW charges 0.59%. MTAW is the cheaper option, by $16 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between AIEQ and MTAW?

40.5% of MTAW's money is in holdings AIEQ also owns. 40.5% of MTAW's is in holdings AIEQ also owns. They hold 8 positions in common, counted across the 163 positions we hold weights for in AIEQ and 25 in MTAW.

Which pays a higher dividend, AIEQ or MTAW?

AIEQ yields 0.40% while MTAW yields 0.00%, so AIEQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is MTAW better than AIEQ?

MTAW has a lower expense ratio. AIEQ is less concentrated, with 41.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 54.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.