AIEQ vs OAIW

AIEQ vs OAIW

Which is better, AIEQ or OAIW?

OAIW costs less.

OAIW has a lower expense ratio. AIEQ is less concentrated, with 41.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 60.5%.

Lower Fees: OAIWLess Concentrated: AIEQ

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricAIEQOAIW
Expense Ratio0.75%0.59%Best
AUM$116M$6M
Dividend Yield0.40%0.00%
Holdings32625
YTD Return+9.72%Best-10.04%
1Y Return+10.97%-
3Y Return (annualized)+18.64%-
5Y Return (annualized)+3.86%-
Top 10 Weight41.1%Best60.5%
Fund FamilyAmplify ETFsHarbor Funds
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Growth
InceptionOct 17, 2017Aug 12, 2026

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

AIEQ vs OAIW growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare AIEQ against instead:AIEQ vs SPYAIEQ vs QQQAIEQ vs VOOAIEQ vs VTIOAIW against:OAIW vs VXUS

AIEQ vs OAIW Performance

Amplify AI Powered Equity ETF (AIEQ) is an ETF from Amplify ETFs and OpenAI Lab Ecosystem ETF (OAIW) is an ETF from Harbor Funds. Year to date, AIEQ is up 9.72% versus a loss of 10.04% for OAIW.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

AIEQ charges 0.75% per year while OAIW charges 0.59%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $59 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AIEQ currently yields 0.40% against 0.00% for OAIW.

Holdings Overlap

AIEQ already in OAIW17.9%
OAIW already in AIEQ38.1%

17.9% of AIEQ's money is in holdings OAIW also owns. 38.1% of OAIW's money is in holdings AIEQ also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

8 positions in common, counted across the 163 positions we hold weights for in AIEQ and 26 in OAIW, against full books of 326 and 25.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 11 positions for OAIW that do not appear in our book for AIEQ (32.1% of the fund), and 151 for AIEQ that do not appear in OAIW (81.5%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in AIEQWeight in OAIWDifference
AVGOBroadcom Inc9.13%4.38%4.75%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp2.18%7.58%5.40%
NVDANvidia Corp3.99%5.11%1.12%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc1.27%5.62%4.35%
ORCLOracle Corp - Common0.05%6.09%6.04%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc1.19%3.05%1.86%
SOSouthern Co.0.05%4.03%3.98%
WECWec Energy Group Inc.0.05%2.29%2.24%

38.1% of OAIW is already inside AIEQ.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

AIEQOAIW

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, AIEQ or OAIW?

AIEQ has an expense ratio of 0.75% while OAIW charges 0.59%. OAIW is the cheaper option, by $16 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between AIEQ and OAIW?

38.1% of OAIW's money is in holdings AIEQ also owns. 38.1% of OAIW's is in holdings AIEQ also owns. They hold 8 positions in common, counted across the 163 positions we hold weights for in AIEQ and 26 in OAIW.

Which pays a higher dividend, AIEQ or OAIW?

AIEQ yields 0.40% while OAIW yields 0.00%, so AIEQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is OAIW better than AIEQ?

OAIW has a lower expense ratio. AIEQ is less concentrated, with 41.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 60.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.