AMOM vs PCLG
Qraft AI-Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum ETF vs Polen Focus Growth ETF
Which is better, AMOM or PCLG?
AMOM has been ahead.
PCLG has a lower expense ratio. AMOM led over 1Y and the full window. AMOM is less concentrated, with 36.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 62.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AMOM | PCLG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.49%Best |
| AUM | $23M | $92M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.04% |
| Holdings | 102 | 27 |
| YTD Return | +19.96%Best | -5.60% |
| 1Y Return | +21.68%Best | -8.10% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.92% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.23% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 26.5% | 17.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -18.0%Best | -23.8% |
| $10,000 over 1 years | $12,151Best | $9,249 |
| Top 10 Weight | 36.9%Best | 62.6% |
| Fund Family | QRAFT AI ETFs | Polen Capital |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 20, 2019 | Sep 30, 2025 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 30, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1 years).
AMOM vs PCLG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1 years both funds cover.
AMOM vs PCLG Performance
Qraft AI-Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) is an ETF from QRAFT AI ETFs and Polen Focus Growth ETF (PCLG) is an ETF from Polen Capital. Over the past year AMOM returned +21.68% while PCLG returned -8.10%. Year to date, AMOM is up 19.96% versus a loss of 5.60% for PCLG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AMOM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 26.5% compared with 17.7% for PCLG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.0% for AMOM and -23.8% for PCLG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.36. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AMOM charges 0.75% per year while PCLG charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $49 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AMOM currently yields 0.00% against 0.04% for PCLG.
Holdings Overlap
23.7% of AMOM's money is in holdings PCLG also owns. 23.7% of PCLG's money is in holdings AMOM also owns.
AMOM and PCLG share little of their money.
8 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in AMOM and 29 in PCLG, against full books of 102 and 27.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 16 positions for PCLG that do not appear in our book for AMOM (67.2% of the fund), and 42 for AMOM that do not appear in PCLG (75.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in AMOM | Weight in PCLG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.55% | 7.82% | 0.73% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.89% | 6.13% | 2.24% |
| GEGeneral Electric Co. | 2.76% | 1.79% | 0.97% |
| STXSeagate Technolo | 2.32% | 1.70% | 0.62% |
| LRCXLrcx Uw Equity | 1.39% | 2.56% | 1.17% |
| PWRQuanta Services Inc | 1.88% | 1.35% | 0.53% |
| EMEEmcor Group Inc | 1.28% | 1.48% | 0.20% |
| HWMHowmet Aerospace | 1.63% | 0.87% | 0.76% |
23.7% of AMOM is already inside PCLG.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AMOM or PCLG?
AMOM has an expense ratio of 0.75% while PCLG charges 0.49%. PCLG is the cheaper option, by $26 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, AMOM or PCLG?
Over the past year AMOM returned +21.68% vs -8.10% for PCLG, so AMOM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), AMOM annualized +21.51% vs -7.51% for PCLG. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, AMOM or PCLG?
AMOM has been the more volatile fund at 26.5% annualized versus 17.7% for PCLG. Worst drawdown: AMOM -18.0% vs PCLG -23.8%.
Should I hold both AMOM and PCLG?
AMOM and PCLG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.36, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between AMOM and PCLG?
23.7% of AMOM's money is in holdings PCLG also owns. 23.7% of PCLG's is in holdings AMOM also owns. They hold 8 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in AMOM and 29 in PCLG.
Which pays a higher dividend, AMOM or PCLG?
AMOM yields 0.00% while PCLG yields 0.04%, so PCLG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PCLG better than AMOM?
PCLG has a lower expense ratio. AMOM led over 1Y and the full window. AMOM is less concentrated, with 36.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 62.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.