ARKF vs GK
ARK Blockchain & Fintech Innovation ETF vs AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF
Which is better, ARKF or GK?
Each has led over a different period.
ARKF has a lower expense ratio. ARKF led over 3Y, GK over 1Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ARKF | GK |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75%Best | 0.77% |
| AUM | $831M | $32M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.09% | 0.07% |
| Holdings | 41 | 60 |
| YTD Return | -4.67% | +10.81%Best |
| 1Y Return | -17.39% | +8.34%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +33.87%Best | +19.66% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -2.60% | +2.56%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 41.3% | 23.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -75.3% | -47.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $8,766 | $11,347Best |
| Fund Family | Ark Invest | Advisor Shares |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Feb 1, 2019 | Jul 1, 2021 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 2, 2021 to Oct 14, 2026 (5.3 years).
ARKF vs GK growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.3 years both funds cover.
ARKF vs GK Performance
ARK Blockchain & Fintech Innovation ETF (ARKF) is an ETF from Ark Invest and AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF (GK) is an ETF from Advisor Shares. Over the past year ARKF returned -17.39% while GK returned +8.34%. Year to date, ARKF is down 4.67% versus a gain of 10.81% for GK.
Over three years, ARKF compounded at +33.87% per year against +19.66% for GK; over five years the annualized figures are -2.60% and +2.56% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ARKF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 41.3% compared with 23.0% for GK. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -75.3% for ARKF and -47.7% for GK. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ARKF charges 0.75% per year while GK charges 0.77%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $77 annually, a gap of $2 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ARKF currently yields 0.09% against 0.07% for GK.
Holdings Overlap
At least 16.3% of GK's money is in holdings ARKF also owns.
Stated as a floor: for ARKF, our book for it covers 90.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
GK and ARKF share little of their money.
4 positions in common, counted across the 37 positions we hold weights for in ARKF and 27 in GK, against full books of 41 and 60.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ARKF and GK you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ARKF or GK?
ARKF has an expense ratio of 0.75% while GK charges 0.77%. ARKF is the cheaper option, by $2 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ARKF or GK?
Over the past year ARKF returned -17.39% vs +8.34% for GK, so GK leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ARKF or GK?
ARKF has been the more volatile fund at 41.3% annualized versus 23.0% for GK. Worst drawdown: ARKF -75.3% vs GK -47.7%.
Should I hold both ARKF and GK?
ARKF and GK have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ARKF and GK?
At least 16.3% of GK's money is in holdings ARKF also owns. Our book for ARKF is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 4 positions in common, counted across the 37 positions we hold weights for in ARKF and 27 in GK.
Which pays a higher dividend, ARKF or GK?
ARKF yields 0.09% while GK yields 0.07%, so ARKF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is GK better than ARKF?
ARKF has a lower expense ratio. ARKF led over 3Y, GK over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.