ASCE vs PJSM

ASCE vs PJSM

Which is better, ASCE or PJSM?

PJSM costs less.

PJSM has a lower expense ratio. PJSM is less concentrated, with 18.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 25.2%.

Lower Fees: PJSMLess Concentrated: PJSM

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricASCEPJSM
Expense Ratio0.38%0.29%Best
AUM$253M$6M
Dividend Yield0.18%0.00%
Holdings52249
YTD Return+18.95%Best-5.15%
1Y Return+25.26%-
Top 10 Weight25.2%18.4%Best
Fund FamilyAllspring Global InvestmentsPGIM Investments
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleSmall Cap BlendSmall Cap Blend
InceptionJul 8, 2025Sep 1, 2026

Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

ASCE vs PJSM growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare ASCE against instead:ASCE vs SPYASCE vs QQQASCE vs VOOASCE vs VTIPJSM against:PJSM vs VXUS

ASCE vs PJSM Performance

Allspring SMID Core ETF (ASCE) is an ETF from Allspring Global Investments and PGIM Jennison Small-Mid Cap Core Equity ETF (PJSM) is an ETF from PGIM Investments. Year to date, ASCE is up 18.95% versus a loss of 5.15% for PJSM.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ASCE charges 0.38% per year while PJSM charges 0.29%. On a $10,000 position that is $38 vs $29 annually, a gap of $9 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ASCE currently yields 0.18% against 0.00% for PJSM.

Holdings Overlap

ASCE already in PJSM20.9%
PJSM already in ASCE5.8%

20.9% of ASCE's money is in holdings PJSM also owns. 5.8% of PJSM's money is in holdings ASCE also owns.

ASCE and PJSM share little of their money.

11 positions in common, counted across the 52 positions we hold weights for in ASCE and 249 in PJSM, against full books of 52 and 249.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 230 positions for PJSM that do not appear in our book for ASCE (89.5% of the fund), and 39 for ASCE that do not appear in PJSM (74.4%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in ASCEWeight in PJSMDifference
OASChord Energy Corp2.34%1.79%0.55%
SMTCSemtech Corp2.68%0.25%2.43%
ONTOOnto Innovation Inc2.17%0.71%1.46%
TTMITtm Techologies2.20%0.51%1.69%
LNCLincoln National Corp.1.51%0.79%0.72%
COCOVITA COCO CO INC/THE2.04%0.21%1.83%
BELFBBel Fuse Inc Class B2.02%0.10%1.92%
ECGEverus Construction Grou W/I Common Stock1.64%0.35%1.29%
DOCNDigitalocean Holdings Inc1.70%0.27%1.43%
CRSCarpenter Technology Corpcommon Stock1.16%0.59%0.57%

20.9% of ASCE is already inside PJSM.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

ASCEPJSM

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ASCE or PJSM?

ASCE has an expense ratio of 0.38% while PJSM charges 0.29%. PJSM is the cheaper option, by $9 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between ASCE and PJSM?

20.9% of ASCE's money is in holdings PJSM also owns. 5.8% of PJSM's is in holdings ASCE also owns. They hold 11 positions in common, counted across the 52 positions we hold weights for in ASCE and 249 in PJSM.

Which pays a higher dividend, ASCE or PJSM?

ASCE yields 0.18% while PJSM yields 0.00%, so ASCE currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is PJSM better than ASCE?

PJSM has a lower expense ratio. PJSM is less concentrated, with 18.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 25.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.