ASCE vs SMAP
Allspring SMID Core ETF vs Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF
Which is better, ASCE or SMAP?
ASCE has been ahead.
ASCE has a lower expense ratio. ASCE led over 1Y. ASCE is less concentrated, with 25.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 32.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ASCE | SMAP |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.38%Best | 0.60% |
| AUM | $253M | $1M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.18% | 0.42% |
| Holdings | 52 | 57 |
| Top 10 Weight | 25.2%Best | 32.8% |
| Fund Family | Allspring Global Investments | Amplify ETFs |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Blend | Small Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 8, 2025 | Oct 23, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
The two price series end 132 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. ASCE has data through Oct 14, 2026 and SMAP through Jun 4, 2026.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ASCE charges 0.38% per year while SMAP charges 0.60%. On a $10,000 position that is $38 vs $60 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ASCE currently yields 0.18% against 0.42% for SMAP.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 52 holdings in ASCE and 56 in SMAP, totalling 99.5% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 156 days apart, ASCE as of Oct 3, 2026 and SMAP as of Apr 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 52 positions we hold weights for in ASCE and 56 in SMAP, against full books of 52 and 57.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 54 positions for SMAP that do not appear in our book for ASCE (97.8% of the fund), and 50 for ASCE that do not appear in SMAP (95.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ASCE and SMAP you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ASCE or SMAP?
ASCE has an expense ratio of 0.38% while SMAP charges 0.60%. ASCE is the cheaper option, by $22 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, ASCE or SMAP?
ASCE yields 0.18% while SMAP yields 0.42%, so SMAP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SMAP better than ASCE?
ASCE has a lower expense ratio. ASCE led over 1Y. ASCE is less concentrated, with 25.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 32.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.