BAFE vs PTL

BAFE vs PTL

Which is better, BAFE or PTL?

Each has led over a different period.

PTL has a lower expense ratio. BAFE led over 1Y, PTL over the full window. PTL is less concentrated, with 28.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.4%.

Lower Fees: PTLHigher Returns: splitLess Concentrated: PTL

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBAFEPTL
Expense Ratio0.54%0.09%Best
AUM$1.8B$892M
Dividend Yield0.27%0.94%
Holdings90941
YTD Return+9.97%Best+9.62%
1Y Return+12.65%Best+10.17%
Volatility (annualized)13.2%Best13.7%
Max Drawdown-18.4%Best-19.7%
$10,000 over 1.9 years$12,035$12,729Best
Top 10 Weight45.4%28.0%Best
Fund FamilyBrown AdvisoryInspire ETFs
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionNov 18, 2024Mar 25, 2024

Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized).

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 18, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.9 years).

BAFE vs PTL growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.9 years both funds cover.

Compare BAFE against instead:BAFE vs SPYBAFE vs QQQBAFE vs VOOBAFE vs VTIPTL against:PTL vs VXUS

BAFE vs PTL Performance

Brown Advisory Flexible Equity ETF (BAFE) is an ETF from Brown Advisory and Inspire 500 ETF (PTL) is an ETF from Inspire ETFs. Over the past year BAFE returned +12.65% while PTL returned +10.17%. Year to date, BAFE is up 9.97% versus a gain of 9.62% for PTL.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

PTL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.7% compared with 13.2% for BAFE. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.4% for BAFE and -19.7% for PTL. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BAFE charges 0.54% per year while PTL charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $54 vs $9 annually, a gap of $45 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BAFE currently yields 0.27% against 0.94% for PTL.

Holdings Overlap

BAFE already in PTL17.3%
PTL already in BAFE6.9%

17.3% of BAFE's money is in holdings PTL also owns. 6.9% of PTL's money is in holdings BAFE also owns.

BAFE and PTL share little of their money.

11 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in BAFE and 501 in PTL, against full books of 90 and 941.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 484 positions for PTL that do not appear in our book for BAFE (92.3% of the fund), and 26 for BAFE that do not appear in PTL (65.5%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in BAFEWeight in PTLDifference
KLACKla-tencor2.28%1.49%0.79%
GEGeneral Electric Co.1.47%1.95%0.48%
URIUnited Rentals Inc.2.75%0.38%2.37%
MRVLMarvell Technology Inc1.85%1.17%0.68%
EWEdwards Lifesciences Corp1.73%0.28%1.45%
WSOWatsco Inc1.88%0.07%1.81%
PGRProgressive Corporation1.14%0.72%0.42%
MDLZMondelez International Inc Com A Npv1.36%0.45%0.91%
ALGNAlign Technology Inc.1.16%0.06%1.10%
TYLTyler Technologies Inc1.11%0.08%1.03%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of BAFE and PTL you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

BAFEPTL

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BAFE or PTL?

BAFE has an expense ratio of 0.54% while PTL charges 0.09%. PTL is the cheaper option, by $45 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, BAFE or PTL?

Over the past year BAFE returned +12.65% vs +10.17% for PTL, so BAFE leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BAFE annualized +10.24% vs +13.54% for PTL. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, BAFE or PTL?

PTL has been the more volatile fund at 13.7% annualized versus 13.2% for BAFE. Worst drawdown: BAFE -18.4% vs PTL -19.7%.

Should I hold both BAFE and PTL?

BAFE and PTL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between BAFE and PTL?

17.3% of BAFE's money is in holdings PTL also owns. 6.9% of PTL's is in holdings BAFE also owns. They hold 11 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in BAFE and 501 in PTL.

Which pays a higher dividend, BAFE or PTL?

BAFE yields 0.27% while PTL yields 0.94%, so PTL currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is PTL better than BAFE?

PTL has a lower expense ratio. BAFE led over 1Y, PTL over the full window. PTL is less concentrated, with 28.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.