BAGX vs FLQL
EA Bridgeway Aggressive Investors ETF vs Franklin US Large Cap Multifactor Index ETF
Which is better, BAGX or FLQL?
BAGX has been ahead.
FLQL has a lower expense ratio. BAGX led over 1Y. BAGX is less concentrated, with 30.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BAGX | FLQL |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.73% | 0.15%Best |
| AUM | $202M | $2.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 94 | 219 |
| YTD Return | +4.87% | +12.74%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +16.39% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.41% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.06% |
| Top 10 Weight | 30.1%Best | 37.2% |
| Fund Family | Bridgeway Funds | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 24, 2026 | Apr 26, 2017 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
BAGX vs FLQL growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BAGX vs FLQL Performance
EA Bridgeway Aggressive Investors ETF (BAGX) is an ETF from Bridgeway Funds and Franklin US Large Cap Multifactor Index ETF (FLQL) is an ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US). Year to date, BAGX is up 4.87% versus a gain of 12.74% for FLQL.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BAGX charges 0.73% per year while FLQL charges 0.15%. On a $10,000 position that is $73 vs $15 annually, a gap of $58 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BAGX currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for FLQL.
Holdings Overlap
62.8% of BAGX's money is in holdings FLQL also owns. 47.2% of FLQL's money is in holdings BAGX also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
47 positions in common, counted across the 94 positions we hold weights for in BAGX and 217 in FLQL, against full books of 94 and 219.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 166 positions for FLQL that do not appear in our book for BAGX (52.1% of the fund), and 42 for BAGX that do not appear in FLQL (33.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BAGX | Weight in FLQL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 5.56% | 7.46% | 1.90% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 4.73% | 7.72% | 2.99% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 3.70% | 5.26% | 1.56% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 4.06% | 3.30% | 0.76% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 1.61% | 3.23% | 1.62% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 2.39% | 1.44% | 0.95% |
| LRCXLrcx Uw Equity | 2.05% | 1.63% | 0.42% |
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 1.79% | 1.65% | 0.14% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 2.01% | 1.21% | 0.80% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 0.95% | 1.72% | 0.77% |
62.8% of BAGX is already inside FLQL.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BAGX or FLQL?
BAGX has an expense ratio of 0.73% while FLQL charges 0.15%. FLQL is the cheaper option, by $58 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between BAGX and FLQL?
62.8% of BAGX's money is in holdings FLQL also owns. 47.2% of FLQL's is in holdings BAGX also owns. They hold 47 positions in common, counted across the 94 positions we hold weights for in BAGX and 217 in FLQL.
Which pays a higher dividend, BAGX or FLQL?
BAGX yields 0.00% while FLQL yields 1.06%, so FLQL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is FLQL better than BAGX?
FLQL has a lower expense ratio. BAGX led over 1Y. BAGX is less concentrated, with 30.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.