BAGX vs FSST
EA Bridgeway Aggressive Investors ETF vs Fidelity Sustainable US Equity ETF
Which is better, BAGX or FSST?
BAGX has been ahead.
FSST has a lower expense ratio. BAGX led over 1Y. BAGX is less concentrated, with 30.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 43.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BAGX | FSST |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.73% | 0.59%Best |
| AUM | $202M | $13M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.55% |
| Holdings | 94 | 90 |
| Volatility (annualized) | - | 17.4% |
| Max Drawdown | - | -26.3% |
| Top 10 Weight | 30.1%Best | 43.8% |
| Fund Family | Bridgeway Funds | Fidelity Investments (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 24, 2026 | Jun 15, 2021 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), $10,000 over the window.
The two price series end 335 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. BAGX has data through Oct 14, 2026 and FSST through Nov 13, 2025.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BAGX charges 0.73% per year while FSST charges 0.59%. On a $10,000 position that is $73 vs $59 annually, a gap of $14 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BAGX currently yields 0.00% against 1.55% for FSST.
Holdings Overlap
27.6% of BAGX's money is in holdings FSST also owns. 36.5% of FSST's money is in holdings BAGX also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
The two holdings books were reported 427 days apart, BAGX as of Oct 1, 2026 and FSST as of Jul 31, 2025, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
11 positions in common, counted across the 94 positions we hold weights for in BAGX and 94 in FSST, against full books of 94 and 90.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 77 positions for FSST that do not appear in our book for BAGX (59.6% of the fund), and 78 for BAGX that do not appear in FSST (68.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BAGX | Weight in FSST | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 5.56% | 8.95% | 3.39% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 3.70% | 7.00% | 3.30% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 4.73% | 5.57% | 0.84% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 4.06% | 3.89% | 0.17% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 1.61% | 5.21% | 3.60% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 2.39% | 0.69% | 1.70% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 0.95% | 1.75% | 0.80% |
| LRCXLrcx Uw Equity | 2.05% | 0.63% | 1.42% |
| MRVLMarvell Technology Inc | 1.20% | 0.91% | 0.29% |
| BACBank of America Corp.: Financials | 0.67% | 1.02% | 0.35% |
36.5% of FSST is already inside BAGX.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BAGX or FSST?
BAGX has an expense ratio of 0.73% while FSST charges 0.59%. FSST is the cheaper option, by $14 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between BAGX and FSST?
36.5% of FSST's money is in holdings BAGX also owns. 36.5% of FSST's is in holdings BAGX also owns. They hold 11 positions in common, counted across the 94 positions we hold weights for in BAGX and 94 in FSST.
Which pays a higher dividend, BAGX or FSST?
BAGX yields 0.00% while FSST yields 1.55%, so FSST currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is FSST better than BAGX?
FSST has a lower expense ratio. BAGX led over 1Y. BAGX is less concentrated, with 30.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 43.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.