BAGX vs TCAF
EA Bridgeway Aggressive Investors ETF vs T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF
Which is better, BAGX or TCAF?
BAGX has been ahead.
TCAF has a lower expense ratio. BAGX led over 1Y. BAGX is less concentrated, with 30.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BAGX | TCAF |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.73% | 0.31%Best |
| AUM | $202M | $9.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.45% |
| Holdings | 94 | 101 |
| YTD Return | +4.87% | +13.46%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +14.72% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.72% |
| Top 10 Weight | 30.1%Best | 39.4% |
| Fund Family | Bridgeway Funds | T.Rowe Price |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 24, 2026 | Jun 14, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
BAGX vs TCAF growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BAGX vs TCAF Performance
EA Bridgeway Aggressive Investors ETF (BAGX) is an ETF from Bridgeway Funds and T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF (TCAF) is an ETF from T.Rowe Price. Year to date, BAGX is up 4.87% versus a gain of 13.46% for TCAF.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BAGX charges 0.73% per year while TCAF charges 0.31%. On a $10,000 position that is $73 vs $31 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BAGX currently yields 0.00% against 0.45% for TCAF.
Holdings Overlap
27.1% of BAGX's money is in holdings TCAF also owns. 32.4% of TCAF's money is in holdings BAGX also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
10 positions in common, counted across the 94 positions we hold weights for in BAGX and 98 in TCAF, against full books of 94 and 101.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 80 positions for TCAF that do not appear in our book for BAGX (57.3% of the fund), and 79 for BAGX that do not appear in TCAF (69.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BAGX | Weight in TCAF | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 5.56% | 5.52% | 0.04% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 3.70% | 6.01% | 2.31% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 4.73% | 4.90% | 0.17% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 4.06% | 3.15% | 0.91% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 1.61% | 5.02% | 3.41% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 2.01% | 2.66% | 0.65% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 2.39% | 1.39% | 1.00% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 0.95% | 2.04% | 1.09% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 0.95% | 1.26% | 0.31% |
| LITELumentum Holdings Inc | 1.18% | 0.49% | 0.69% |
32.4% of TCAF is already inside BAGX.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BAGX or TCAF?
BAGX has an expense ratio of 0.73% while TCAF charges 0.31%. TCAF is the cheaper option, by $42 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between BAGX and TCAF?
32.4% of TCAF's money is in holdings BAGX also owns. 32.4% of TCAF's is in holdings BAGX also owns. They hold 10 positions in common, counted across the 94 positions we hold weights for in BAGX and 98 in TCAF.
Which pays a higher dividend, BAGX or TCAF?
BAGX yields 0.00% while TCAF yields 0.45%, so TCAF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TCAF better than BAGX?
TCAF has a lower expense ratio. BAGX led over 1Y. BAGX is less concentrated, with 30.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.