BAGX vs TCAL

BAGX vs TCAL

Which is better, BAGX or TCAL?

BAGX has been ahead.

TCAL has a lower expense ratio. BAGX led over 1Y. TCAL is less concentrated, with 17.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 30.1%.

Lower Fees: TCALHigher Returns (1Y): BAGXLess Concentrated: TCAL

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBAGXTCAL
Expense Ratio0.73%0.34%Best
AUM$202M$311M
Dividend Yield0.00%11.81%
Holdings94488
YTD Return+4.87%Best+2.64%
1Y Return-+1.67%
Top 10 Weight30.1%17.0%Best
Fund FamilyBridgeway FundsT.Rowe Price
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJul 24, 2026Mar 26, 2025

Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

BAGX vs TCAL growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare BAGX against instead:BAGX vs SPYBAGX vs QQQBAGX vs VOOBAGX vs VTITCAL against:TCAL vs VXUS

BAGX vs TCAL Performance

EA Bridgeway Aggressive Investors ETF (BAGX) is an ETF from Bridgeway Funds and T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF (TCAL) is an ETF from T.Rowe Price. Year to date, BAGX is up 4.87% versus a gain of 2.64% for TCAL.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BAGX charges 0.73% per year while TCAL charges 0.34%. On a $10,000 position that is $73 vs $34 annually, a gap of $39 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BAGX currently yields 0.00% against 11.81% for TCAL.

Holdings Overlap

BAGX already in TCAL18.1%
TCAL already in BAGX13.2%

18.1% of BAGX's money is in holdings TCAL also owns. 13.2% of TCAL's money is in holdings BAGX also owns.

BAGX and TCAL share little of their money.

11 positions in common, counted across the 94 positions we hold weights for in BAGX and 103 in TCAL, against full books of 94 and 488.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 87 positions for TCAL that do not appear in our book for BAGX (81.9% of the fund), and 78 for BAGX that do not appear in TCAL (78.3%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in BAGXWeight in TCALDifference
NVDANvidia Corp5.56%1.28%4.28%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp3.70%1.94%1.76%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc1.61%1.67%0.06%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc2.01%1.18%0.83%
MAMastercard Inc0.95%1.79%0.84%
VVisa Inc Class A0.95%1.19%0.24%
CAHCardinal Health Inc.0.81%0.90%0.09%
COSTCostco Wholesale Corp.0.55%1.11%0.56%
LINLinde Plc Ordinary Shares0.74%0.89%0.15%
ADPAutomatic Data Processing, Inc.0.61%0.66%0.05%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of BAGX and TCAL you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

BAGXTCAL

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BAGX or TCAL?

BAGX has an expense ratio of 0.73% while TCAL charges 0.34%. TCAL is the cheaper option, by $39 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between BAGX and TCAL?

18.1% of BAGX's money is in holdings TCAL also owns. 13.2% of TCAL's is in holdings BAGX also owns. They hold 11 positions in common, counted across the 94 positions we hold weights for in BAGX and 103 in TCAL.

Which pays a higher dividend, BAGX or TCAL?

BAGX yields 0.00% while TCAL yields 11.81%, so TCAL currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is TCAL better than BAGX?

TCAL has a lower expense ratio. BAGX led over 1Y. TCAL is less concentrated, with 17.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 30.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.