BASG vs FELG
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth ETF vs Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF
Which is better, BASG or FELG?
FELG has been ahead.
FELG has a lower expense ratio. FELG led over 1Y and the full window. BASG is less concentrated, with 48.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 58.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BASG | FELG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.61% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $527M | $5.8B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.35% |
| Holdings | 36 | 135 |
| YTD Return | +10.02%Best | +7.63% |
| 1Y Return | +8.00% | +10.39%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.35% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.4%Best | 15.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -19.3% | -16.2%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.3 years | $11,181 | $12,476Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 48.9%Best | 58.3% |
| Fund Family | Brown Advisory | Fidelity Investments (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jun 13, 2025 | Nov 20, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 16, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.3 years).
BASG vs FELG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.3 years both funds cover.
BASG vs FELG Performance
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth ETF (BASG) is an ETF from Brown Advisory and Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF (FELG) is an ETF from Fidelity Investments (US). Over the past year BASG returned +8.00% while FELG returned +10.39%. Year to date, BASG is up 10.02% versus a gain of 7.63% for FELG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FELG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.9% compared with 14.4% for BASG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.3% for BASG and -16.2% for FELG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BASG charges 0.61% per year while FELG charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $61 vs $18 annually, a gap of $43 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BASG currently yields 0.00% against 0.35% for FELG.
Holdings Overlap
65.9% of BASG's money is in holdings FELG also owns. 37.1% of FELG's money is in holdings BASG also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
20 positions in common, counted across the 34 positions we hold weights for in BASG and 127 in FELG, against full books of 36 and 135.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 93 positions for FELG that do not appear in our book for BASG (62.5% of the fund), and 10 for BASG that do not appear in FELG (21.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BASG | Weight in FELG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.77% | 16.24% | 7.47% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.99% | 5.00% | 0.99% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.32% | 5.05% | 0.73% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 4.04% | 2.99% | 1.05% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 5.83% | 0.53% | 5.30% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 4.74% | 1.27% | 3.47% |
| MRVLMarvell Technology Inc | 3.83% | 0.12% | 3.71% |
| ANETArista Networks Inc. | 3.32% | 0.45% | 2.87% |
| GEGeneral Electric Co. | 2.11% | 1.31% | 0.80% |
| SCHWSchwab Strategic T | 2.60% | 0.52% | 2.08% |
65.9% of BASG is already inside FELG.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BASG or FELG?
BASG has an expense ratio of 0.61% while FELG charges 0.18%. FELG is the cheaper option, by $43 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BASG or FELG?
Over the past year BASG returned +8.00% vs +10.39% for FELG, so FELG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), BASG annualized +8.97% vs +18.55% for FELG. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BASG or FELG?
FELG has been the more volatile fund at 15.9% annualized versus 14.4% for BASG. Worst drawdown: BASG -19.3% vs FELG -16.2%.
Should I hold both BASG and FELG?
BASG and FELG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BASG and FELG?
65.9% of BASG's money is in holdings FELG also owns. 37.1% of FELG's is in holdings BASG also owns. They hold 20 positions in common, counted across the 34 positions we hold weights for in BASG and 127 in FELG.
Which pays a higher dividend, BASG or FELG?
BASG yields 0.00% while FELG yields 0.35%, so FELG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is FELG better than BASG?
FELG has a lower expense ratio. FELG led over 1Y and the full window. BASG is less concentrated, with 48.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 58.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.