BASG vs FLCG
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth ETF vs Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth ETF
Which is better, BASG or FLCG?
FLCG has been ahead.
FLCG has a lower expense ratio. FLCG led over 1Y and the full window. BASG is less concentrated, with 48.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 56.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BASG | FLCG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.61% | 0.39%Best |
| AUM | $527M | $687M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.04% |
| Holdings | 36 | 208 |
| YTD Return | +10.02%Best | +7.29% |
| 1Y Return | +8.00% | +9.89%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.4%Tie | 14.4%Tie |
| Max Drawdown | -19.3% | -15.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.3 years | $11,181 | $12,068Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 48.9%Best | 56.5% |
| Fund Family | Brown Advisory | Federated Hermes |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jun 13, 2025 | Jul 30, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 16, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.3 years).
BASG vs FLCG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.3 years both funds cover.
BASG vs FLCG Performance
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth ETF (BASG) is an ETF from Brown Advisory and Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth ETF (FLCG) is an ETF from Federated Hermes. Over the past year BASG returned +8.00% while FLCG returned +9.89%. Year to date, BASG is up 10.02% versus a gain of 7.29% for FLCG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BASG and FLCG have been equally volatile, both at 14.4% annualized.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.3% for BASG and -15.1% for FLCG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BASG charges 0.61% per year while FLCG charges 0.39%. On a $10,000 position that is $61 vs $39 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BASG currently yields 0.00% against 0.04% for FLCG.
Holdings Overlap
45.8% of BASG's money is in holdings FLCG also owns. 30.8% of FLCG's money is in holdings BASG also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
13 positions in common, counted across the 34 positions we hold weights for in BASG and 100 in FLCG, against full books of 36 and 208.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 82 positions for FLCG that do not appear in our book for BASG (68.4% of the fund), and 17 for BASG that do not appear in FLCG (41.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BASG | Weight in FLCG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.77% | 15.20% | 6.43% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.99% | 4.54% | 1.45% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.32% | 3.10% | 1.22% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 5.83% | 0.61% | 5.22% |
| ANETArista Networks Inc. | 3.32% | 2.58% | 0.74% |
| GEGeneral Electric Co. | 2.11% | 2.17% | 0.06% |
| SNOWSnowflake Inc | 2.56% | 0.66% | 1.90% |
| CDNSCadence Design Systems Inc. | 2.83% | 0.37% | 2.46% |
| ABNBAirbnb Inc | 2.19% | 0.62% | 1.57% |
| ISRGIntuitive Surgical Inc. | 2.79% | 0.01% | 2.78% |
45.8% of BASG is already inside FLCG.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BASG or FLCG?
BASG has an expense ratio of 0.61% while FLCG charges 0.39%. FLCG is the cheaper option, by $22 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BASG or FLCG?
Over the past year BASG returned +8.00% vs +9.89% for FLCG, so FLCG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), BASG annualized +8.97% vs +15.56% for FLCG. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BASG or FLCG?
BASG and FLCG have been equally volatile, both at 14.4% annualized. Worst drawdown: BASG -19.3% vs FLCG -15.1%.
Should I hold both BASG and FLCG?
BASG and FLCG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BASG and FLCG?
45.8% of BASG's money is in holdings FLCG also owns. 30.8% of FLCG's is in holdings BASG also owns. They hold 13 positions in common, counted across the 34 positions we hold weights for in BASG and 100 in FLCG.
Which pays a higher dividend, BASG or FLCG?
BASG yields 0.00% while FLCG yields 0.04%, so FLCG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is FLCG better than BASG?
FLCG has a lower expense ratio. FLCG led over 1Y and the full window. BASG is less concentrated, with 48.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 56.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.