BASG vs LRGG
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth ETF vs Nomura Focused Large Growth ETF
Which is better, BASG or LRGG?
BASG has been ahead.
LRGG has a lower expense ratio. BASG led over 1Y and the full window. BASG is less concentrated, with 48.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 71.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BASG | LRGG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.61% | 0.44%Best |
| AUM | $527M | $295M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.15% |
| Holdings | 36 | 44 |
| YTD Return | +10.02%Best | +3.29% |
| 1Y Return | +8.00%Best | +3.58% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.4% | 13.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -19.3% | -18.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.3 years | $11,181Best | $10,820 |
| Top 10 Weight | 48.9%Best | 71.4% |
| Fund Family | Brown Advisory | Nomura Asset Management Co Ltd |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jun 13, 2025 | May 14, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 16, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.3 years).
BASG vs LRGG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.3 years both funds cover.
BASG vs LRGG Performance
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth ETF (BASG) is an ETF from Brown Advisory and Nomura Focused Large Growth ETF (LRGG) is an ETF from Nomura Asset Management Co Ltd. Over the past year BASG returned +8.00% while LRGG returned +3.58%. Year to date, BASG is up 10.02% versus a gain of 3.29% for LRGG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BASG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.4% compared with 13.4% for LRGG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.3% for BASG and -18.9% for LRGG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BASG charges 0.61% per year while LRGG charges 0.44%. On a $10,000 position that is $61 vs $44 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BASG currently yields 0.00% against 0.15% for LRGG.
Holdings Overlap
41.9% of BASG's money is in holdings LRGG also owns. 62.9% of LRGG's money is in holdings BASG also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
9 positions in common, counted across the 34 positions we hold weights for in BASG and 21 in LRGG, against full books of 36 and 44.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 10 positions for LRGG that do not appear in our book for BASG (32.4% of the fund), and 22 for BASG that do not appear in LRGG (50.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BASG | Weight in LRGG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.77% | 17.15% | 8.38% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 4.04% | 10.98% | 6.94% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.99% | 9.02% | 3.03% |
| 2330:TWTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd | 4.93% | 6.23% | 1.30% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 4.74% | 4.60% | 0.14% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 5.83% | 3.49% | 2.34% |
| ISRGIntuitive Surgical Inc. | 2.79% | 4.50% | 1.71% |
| GEGeneral Electric Co. | 2.11% | 4.04% | 1.93% |
| DHRDanaher Corporation | 2.69% | 2.93% | 0.24% |
62.9% of LRGG is already inside BASG.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BASG or LRGG?
BASG has an expense ratio of 0.61% while LRGG charges 0.44%. LRGG is the cheaper option, by $17 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BASG or LRGG?
Over the past year BASG returned +8.00% vs +3.58% for LRGG, so BASG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), BASG annualized +8.97% vs +6.25% for LRGG. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BASG or LRGG?
BASG has been the more volatile fund at 14.4% annualized versus 13.4% for LRGG. Worst drawdown: BASG -19.3% vs LRGG -18.9%.
Should I hold both BASG and LRGG?
BASG and LRGG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BASG and LRGG?
62.9% of LRGG's money is in holdings BASG also owns. 62.9% of LRGG's is in holdings BASG also owns. They hold 9 positions in common, counted across the 34 positions we hold weights for in BASG and 21 in LRGG.
Which pays a higher dividend, BASG or LRGG?
BASG yields 0.00% while LRGG yields 0.15%, so LRGG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is LRGG better than BASG?
LRGG has a lower expense ratio. BASG led over 1Y and the full window. BASG is less concentrated, with 48.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 71.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.