BASG vs NBGX
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth ETF vs Neuberger Berman Growth ETF
Which is better, BASG or NBGX?
NBGX has been ahead.
NBGX has a lower expense ratio. NBGX led over 1Y and the full window. BASG is less concentrated, with 48.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 53.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BASG | NBGX |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.61% | 0.44%Best |
| AUM | $527M | $15M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.38% |
| Holdings | 36 | 112 |
| YTD Return | +10.02%Best | +8.10% |
| 1Y Return | +8.00% | +9.56%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.4% | 13.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -19.3% | -14.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.3 years | $11,181 | $12,003Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 48.9%Best | 53.4% |
| Fund Family | Brown Advisory | Neuberger Berman ETF Trust |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jun 13, 2025 | Dec 18, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 16, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.3 years).
BASG vs NBGX growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.3 years both funds cover.
BASG vs NBGX Performance
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth ETF (BASG) is an ETF from Brown Advisory and Neuberger Berman Growth ETF (NBGX) is an ETF from Neuberger Berman ETF Trust. Over the past year BASG returned +8.00% while NBGX returned +9.56%. Year to date, BASG is up 10.02% versus a gain of 8.10% for NBGX.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BASG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.4% compared with 13.9% for NBGX. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.3% for BASG and -14.9% for NBGX. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BASG charges 0.61% per year while NBGX charges 0.44%. On a $10,000 position that is $61 vs $44 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BASG currently yields 0.00% against 0.38% for NBGX.
Holdings Overlap
43.1% of BASG's money is in holdings NBGX also owns. 33.4% of NBGX's money is in holdings BASG also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
10 positions in common, counted across the 34 positions we hold weights for in BASG and 58 in NBGX, against full books of 36 and 112.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 45 positions for NBGX that do not appear in our book for BASG (60.2% of the fund), and 22 for BASG that do not appear in NBGX (51.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BASG | Weight in NBGX | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.77% | 10.67% | 1.90% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.99% | 5.36% | 0.63% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 5.83% | 3.91% | 1.92% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.32% | 4.94% | 0.62% |
| 2330:TWTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd | 4.93% | 2.90% | 2.03% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 4.74% | 2.38% | 2.36% |
| GEGeneral Electric Co. | 2.11% | 1.51% | 0.60% |
| SHOP:CAShopify Inc - Common | 2.34% | 0.97% | 1.37% |
| ISRGIntuitive Surgical Inc. | 2.79% | 0.42% | 2.37% |
| SPCXSpace Exploration Technologies | 1.31% | 0.37% | 0.94% |
43.1% of BASG is already inside NBGX.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BASG or NBGX?
BASG has an expense ratio of 0.61% while NBGX charges 0.44%. NBGX is the cheaper option, by $17 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BASG or NBGX?
Over the past year BASG returned +8.00% vs +9.56% for NBGX, so NBGX leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), BASG annualized +8.97% vs +15.08% for NBGX. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BASG or NBGX?
BASG has been the more volatile fund at 14.4% annualized versus 13.9% for NBGX. Worst drawdown: BASG -19.3% vs NBGX -14.9%.
Should I hold both BASG and NBGX?
BASG and NBGX have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BASG and NBGX?
43.1% of BASG's money is in holdings NBGX also owns. 33.4% of NBGX's is in holdings BASG also owns. They hold 10 positions in common, counted across the 34 positions we hold weights for in BASG and 58 in NBGX.
Which pays a higher dividend, BASG or NBGX?
BASG yields 0.00% while NBGX yields 0.38%, so NBGX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is NBGX better than BASG?
NBGX has a lower expense ratio. NBGX led over 1Y and the full window. BASG is less concentrated, with 48.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 53.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.