BASG vs TCHP
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth ETF vs T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF
Which is better, BASG or TCHP?
Each has led over a different period.
TCHP has a lower expense ratio. BASG led over 1Y, TCHP over the full window. BASG is less concentrated, with 48.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 59.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BASG | TCHP |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.61% | 0.57%Best |
| AUM | $527M | $2.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 36 | 65 |
| YTD Return | +10.02%Best | +2.74% |
| 1Y Return | +8.00%Best | +5.10% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.81% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.18% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.4%Best | 16.1% |
| Max Drawdown | -19.3% | -17.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.3 years | $11,181 | $11,661Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 48.9%Best | 59.3% |
| Fund Family | Brown Advisory | T.Rowe Price |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jun 13, 2025 | Aug 4, 2020 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 16, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.3 years).
BASG vs TCHP growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.3 years both funds cover.
BASG vs TCHP Performance
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth ETF (BASG) is an ETF from Brown Advisory and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF (TCHP) is an ETF from T.Rowe Price. Over the past year BASG returned +8.00% while TCHP returned +5.10%. Year to date, BASG is up 10.02% versus a gain of 2.74% for TCHP.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TCHP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.1% compared with 14.4% for BASG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.3% for BASG and -17.5% for TCHP. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BASG charges 0.61% per year while TCHP charges 0.57%. On a $10,000 position that is $61 vs $57 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BASG currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for TCHP.
Holdings Overlap
63.8% of BASG's money is in holdings TCHP also owns. 48.8% of TCHP's money is in holdings BASG also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
17 positions in common, counted across the 34 positions we hold weights for in BASG and 62 in TCHP, against full books of 36 and 65.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 43 positions for TCHP that do not appear in our book for BASG (49.1% of the fund), and 15 for BASG that do not appear in TCHP (31.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BASG | Weight in TCHP | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.77% | 17.43% | 8.66% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.99% | 5.92% | 0.07% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.32% | 5.79% | 1.47% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 4.04% | 5.94% | 1.90% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 5.83% | 3.60% | 2.23% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 4.74% | 2.69% | 2.05% |
| 2330:TWTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd | 4.93% | 0.91% | 4.02% |
| MRVLMarvell Technology Inc | 3.83% | 0.73% | 3.10% |
| GEGeneral Electric Co. | 2.11% | 1.75% | 0.36% |
| MPWRMonolithic Power Systems Inc | 3.12% | 0.66% | 2.46% |
63.8% of BASG is already inside TCHP.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BASG or TCHP?
BASG has an expense ratio of 0.61% while TCHP charges 0.57%. TCHP is the cheaper option, by $4 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BASG or TCHP?
Over the past year BASG returned +8.00% vs +5.10% for TCHP, so BASG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), BASG annualized +8.97% vs +12.55% for TCHP. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BASG or TCHP?
TCHP has been the more volatile fund at 16.1% annualized versus 14.4% for BASG. Worst drawdown: BASG -19.3% vs TCHP -17.5%.
Should I hold both BASG and TCHP?
BASG and TCHP have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BASG and TCHP?
63.8% of BASG's money is in holdings TCHP also owns. 48.8% of TCHP's is in holdings BASG also owns. They hold 17 positions in common, counted across the 34 positions we hold weights for in BASG and 62 in TCHP.
Which pays a higher dividend, BASG or TCHP?
BASG yields 0.00% while TCHP yields 0.00%, so TCHP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TCHP better than BASG?
TCHP has a lower expense ratio. BASG led over 1Y, TCHP over the full window. BASG is less concentrated, with 48.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 59.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.