BBLS vs VTI
Munificent Seven ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, BBLS or VTI?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BBLS | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.32% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $9M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 8 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +6.12% | +13.02%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +16.63% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.97% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.99% |
| Fund Family | Harbor Funds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 19, 2026 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
BBLS vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BBLS vs VTI Performance
Munificent Seven ETF (BBLS) is an ETF from Harbor Funds and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, BBLS is up 6.12% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BBLS charges 0.32% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $32 vs $3 annually, a gap of $29 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BBLS currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 1.6% of VTI's money is in holdings BBLS also owns.
Stated as a floor: for BBLS, our book for it covers 67.6% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
VTI and BBLS share little of their money.
3 positions in common, counted across the 8 positions we hold weights for in BBLS and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 8 and 3,524.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BBLS and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BBLS or VTI?
BBLS has an expense ratio of 0.32% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $29 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between BBLS and VTI?
At least 1.6% of VTI's money is in holdings BBLS also owns. Our book for BBLS is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 3 positions in common, counted across the 8 positions we hold weights for in BBLS and 3,441 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, BBLS or VTI?
BBLS yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.06%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than BBLS?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.