BBLU vs FFLC
EA Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF vs Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF
Which is better, BBLU or FFLC?
BBLU has been ahead.
BBLU has a lower expense ratio. BBLU led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. BBLU is less concentrated, with 34.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BBLU | FFLC |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15%Best | 0.38% |
| AUM | $483M | $1.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.12% | 1.01% |
| Holdings | 39 | 216 |
| YTD Return | +15.50%Best | +9.90% |
| 1Y Return | +18.03%Best | +14.13% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.45%Best | +22.06% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.97% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.8%Best | 13.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -17.2%Best | -19.7% |
| $10,000 over 4 years | $24,274Best | $22,306 |
| Top 10 Weight | 34.7%Best | 41.9% |
| Fund Family | Bridgeway Funds | Fidelity Investments (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jul 31, 1997 | Jun 2, 2020 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 17, 2022 to Oct 14, 2026 (4 years).
BBLU vs FFLC growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4 years both funds cover.
BBLU vs FFLC Performance
EA Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF (BBLU) is an ETF from Bridgeway Funds and Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC) is an ETF from Fidelity Investments (US). Over the past year BBLU returned +18.03% while FFLC returned +14.13%. Year to date, BBLU is up 15.50% versus a gain of 9.90% for FFLC.
Over three years, BBLU compounded at +23.45% per year against +22.06% for FFLC. Across the full 4-year window we track, BBLU has the edge at +24.82% annualized vs +22.21%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FFLC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.3% compared with 11.8% for BBLU. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.2% for BBLU and -19.7% for FFLC. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BBLU charges 0.15% per year while FFLC charges 0.38%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $38 annually, a gap of $23 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BBLU currently yields 1.12% against 1.01% for FFLC.
Holdings Overlap
53.4% of BBLU's money is in holdings FFLC also owns. 48.8% of FFLC's money is in holdings BBLU also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
19 positions in common, counted across the 38 positions we hold weights for in BBLU and 108 in FFLC, against full books of 39 and 216.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 38 and 108 positions we hold weights for.
FFLC holds 77 positions BBLU does not, 42.9% of the fund.
Largest: BA 1.77%, WDC 1.41%, STX 1.37%, WAB 1.32%, GE 1.30%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BBLU | Weight in FFLC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 4.03% | 8.82% | 4.79% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 1.86% | 6.67% | 4.81% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 3.73% | 4.44% | 0.71% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 2.49% | 5.51% | 3.02% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 3.22% | 4.64% | 1.42% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 3.02% | 3.11% | 0.09% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.49% | 2.17% | 1.32% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 4.10% | 0.80% | 3.30% |
| XOMExxonmobil Corp. | 2.50% | 2.06% | 0.44% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 2.46% | 1.90% | 0.56% |
53.4% of BBLU is already inside FFLC.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BBLU or FFLC?
BBLU has an expense ratio of 0.15% while FFLC charges 0.38%. BBLU is the cheaper option, by $23 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BBLU or FFLC?
Over the past year BBLU returned +18.03% vs +14.13% for FFLC, so BBLU leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), BBLU annualized +24.82% vs +22.21% for FFLC. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BBLU or FFLC?
FFLC has been the more volatile fund at 13.3% annualized versus 11.8% for BBLU. Worst drawdown: BBLU -17.2% vs FFLC -19.7%.
Should I hold both BBLU and FFLC?
BBLU and FFLC have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BBLU and FFLC?
53.4% of BBLU's money is in holdings FFLC also owns. 48.8% of FFLC's is in holdings BBLU also owns. They hold 19 positions in common, counted across the 38 positions we hold weights for in BBLU and 108 in FFLC.
Which pays a higher dividend, BBLU or FFLC?
BBLU yields 1.12% while FFLC yields 1.01%, so BBLU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is FFLC better than BBLU?
BBLU has a lower expense ratio. BBLU led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. BBLU is less concentrated, with 34.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.