BBLU vs WBIF
EA Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF vs WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF
Which is better, BBLU or WBIF?
BBLU has been ahead.
BBLU has a lower expense ratio. BBLU led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BBLU | WBIF |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15%Best | 1.65% |
| AUM | $483M | $23M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.12% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 39 | 152 |
| YTD Return | +15.50%Best | +14.87% |
| 1Y Return | +18.03%Best | +15.37% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.45%Best | +10.35% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +4.01% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.8%Best | 13.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -17.2%Tie | -17.2%Tie |
| $10,000 over 4 years | $24,274Best | $12,865 |
| Fund Family | Bridgeway Funds | WBI Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jul 31, 1997 | Aug 25, 2014 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 17, 2022 to Oct 14, 2026 (4 years).
BBLU vs WBIF growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4 years both funds cover.
BBLU vs WBIF Performance
EA Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF (BBLU) is an ETF from Bridgeway Funds and WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF (WBIF) is an ETF from WBI Investments. Over the past year BBLU returned +18.03% while WBIF returned +15.37%. Year to date, BBLU is up 15.50% versus a gain of 14.87% for WBIF.
Over three years, BBLU compounded at +23.45% per year against +10.35% for WBIF. Across the full 4-year window we track, BBLU has the edge at +24.82% annualized vs +6.50%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
WBIF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.4% compared with 11.8% for BBLU. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.2% for BBLU and -17.2% for WBIF. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BBLU charges 0.15% per year while WBIF charges 1.65%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $165 annually, a gap of $150 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BBLU currently yields 1.12% against 0.00% for WBIF.
Holdings Overlap
At least 16.3% of BBLU's money is in holdings WBIF also owns.
Stated as a floor: for WBIF, our book for it covers 83.6% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
BBLU and WBIF share little of their money.
6 positions in common, counted across the 38 positions we hold weights for in BBLU and 62 in WBIF, against full books of 39 and 152.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 38 and 62 positions we hold weights for.
WBIF holds 53 positions BBLU does not, 70.9% of the fund.
Largest: PEGA 2.75%, HPQ 2.74%, ROST 2.47%, BALL 2.38%, TW 2.30%
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BBLU and WBIF you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BBLU or WBIF?
BBLU has an expense ratio of 0.15% while WBIF charges 1.65%. BBLU is the cheaper option, by $150 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BBLU or WBIF?
Over the past year BBLU returned +18.03% vs +15.37% for WBIF, so BBLU leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), BBLU annualized +24.82% vs +6.50% for WBIF. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BBLU or WBIF?
WBIF has been the more volatile fund at 13.4% annualized versus 11.8% for BBLU. Worst drawdown: BBLU -17.2% vs WBIF -17.2%.
Should I hold both BBLU and WBIF?
BBLU and WBIF have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BBLU and WBIF?
At least 16.3% of BBLU's money is in holdings WBIF also owns. Our book for WBIF is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 6 positions in common, counted across the 38 positions we hold weights for in BBLU and 62 in WBIF.
Which pays a higher dividend, BBLU or WBIF?
BBLU yields 1.12% while WBIF yields 0.00%, so BBLU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is WBIF better than BBLU?
BBLU has a lower expense ratio. BBLU led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.