BBYY vs IVV
GraniteShares YieldBOOST BABA ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, BBYY or IVV?
Leverage Strategy against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BBYY | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.07% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $609,478.96 | $896.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 128.07% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 14 | 508 |
| YTD Return | -27.44% | +13.59%Best |
| 1Y Return | -28.29% | +17.54%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.46% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.28% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.1% | 13.2%Best |
| Fund Family | GraniteShares | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Leverage Strategy | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 21, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
BBYY vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BBYY vs IVV Performance
GraniteShares YieldBOOST BABA ETF (BBYY) is an ETF from GraniteShares and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BBYY returned -28.29% while IVV returned +17.54%. Year to date, BBYY is down 27.44% versus a gain of 13.59% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BBYY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.1% compared with 13.2% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.24. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BBYY charges 1.07% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $107 vs $3 annually, a gap of $104 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BBYY currently yields 128.07% against 1.10% for IVV.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BBYY and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BBYY or IVV?
BBYY has an expense ratio of 1.07% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $104 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BBYY or IVV?
Over the past year BBYY returned -28.29% vs +17.54% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BBYY or IVV?
BBYY has been the more volatile fund at 23.1% annualized versus 13.2% for IVV.
Should I hold both BBYY and IVV?
BBYY and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.24, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BBYY or IVV?
BBYY yields 128.07% while IVV yields 1.10%, so BBYY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than BBYY?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.