BBYY vs QQQ
GraniteShares YieldBOOST BABA ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, BBYY or QQQ?
Leverage Strategy against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BBYY | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.07% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $609,478.96 | $506.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 128.07% | 0.42% |
| Holdings | 14 | 321 |
| YTD Return | -27.44% | +19.30%Best |
| 1Y Return | -28.29% | +22.47%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +26.18% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.42% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.1% | 21.9%Best |
| Fund Family | GraniteShares | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Leverage Strategy | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Oct 21, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
BBYY vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BBYY vs QQQ Performance
GraniteShares YieldBOOST BABA ETF (BBYY) is an ETF from GraniteShares and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year BBYY returned -28.29% while QQQ returned +22.47%. Year to date, BBYY is down 27.44% versus a gain of 19.30% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BBYY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.1% compared with 21.9% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.02. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BBYY charges 1.07% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $107 vs $18 annually, a gap of $89 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BBYY currently yields 128.07% against 0.42% for QQQ.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BBYY and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BBYY or QQQ?
BBYY has an expense ratio of 1.07% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $89 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BBYY or QQQ?
Over the past year BBYY returned -28.29% vs +22.47% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BBYY or QQQ?
BBYY has been the more volatile fund at 23.1% annualized versus 21.9% for QQQ.
Should I hold both BBYY and QQQ?
BBYY and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.02, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BBYY or QQQ?
BBYY yields 128.07% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so BBYY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than BBYY?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.