BCGD vs BGGG
Baron Global Durable Advantage ETF vs Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth ETF
Which is better, BCGD or BGGG?
BGGG costs less.
BGGG has a lower expense ratio. BCGD is less concentrated, with 52.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 52.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BCGD | BGGG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.70%Best |
| AUM | - | $282M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 80 | 43 |
| YTD Return | +3.14%Best | -6.81% |
| Top 10 Weight | 52.4%Best | 52.5% |
| Fund Family | Baron Funds | Baillie Gifford Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Dec 12, 2025 | Jun 1, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
BCGD vs BGGG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BCGD vs BGGG Performance
Baron Global Durable Advantage ETF (BCGD) is an ETF from Baron Funds and Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth ETF (BGGG) is an ETF from Baillie Gifford Funds. Year to date, BCGD is up 3.14% versus a loss of 6.81% for BGGG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BCGD charges 0.75% per year while BGGG charges 0.70%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $70 annually, a gap of $5 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BCGD currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for BGGG.
Holdings Overlap
17.6% of BCGD's money is in holdings BGGG also owns. 23.5% of BGGG's money is in holdings BCGD also owns.
BGGG and BCGD share little of their money.
5 positions in common, counted across the 39 positions we hold weights for in BCGD and 40 in BGGG, against full books of 80 and 43.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 20 positions for BGGG that do not appear in our book for BCGD (38.9% of the fund), and 20 for BCGD that do not appear in BGGG (47.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
23.5% of BGGG is already inside BCGD.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BCGD or BGGG?
BCGD has an expense ratio of 0.75% while BGGG charges 0.70%. BGGG is the cheaper option, by $5 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between BCGD and BGGG?
23.5% of BGGG's money is in holdings BCGD also owns. 23.5% of BGGG's is in holdings BCGD also owns. They hold 5 positions in common, counted across the 39 positions we hold weights for in BCGD and 40 in BGGG.
Which pays a higher dividend, BCGD or BGGG?
BCGD yields 0.00% while BGGG yields 0.00%, so BGGG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is BGGG better than BCGD?
BGGG has a lower expense ratio. BCGD is less concentrated, with 52.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 52.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.