BCGD vs CGGO

BCGD vs CGGO

Which is better, BCGD or CGGO?

CGGO costs less.

CGGO has a lower expense ratio. CGGO is less concentrated, with 34.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 52.4%.

Lower Fees: CGGOLess Concentrated: CGGO

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBCGDCGGO
Expense Ratio0.75%0.47%Best
AUM-$11.9B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.00%
Holdings80106
YTD Return+3.14%+8.88%Best
1Y Return-+12.88%
3Y Return (annualized)-+19.50%
Top 10 Weight52.4%34.9%Best
Fund FamilyBaron FundsCapital Group (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Growth
InceptionDec 12, 2025Feb 22, 2022

Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

BCGD vs CGGO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare BCGD against instead:BCGD vs SPYBCGD vs QQQBCGD vs VOOBCGD vs VTICGGO against:CGGO vs VXUS

BCGD vs CGGO Performance

Baron Global Durable Advantage ETF (BCGD) is an ETF from Baron Funds and Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF (CGGO) is an ETF from Capital Group (US). Year to date, BCGD is up 3.14% versus a gain of 8.88% for CGGO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BCGD charges 0.75% per year while CGGO charges 0.47%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $47 annually, a gap of $28 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BCGD currently yields 0.00% against 1.00% for CGGO.

Holdings Overlap

BCGD already in CGGO46.6%
CGGO already in BCGD23.1%

46.6% of BCGD's money is in holdings CGGO also owns. 23.1% of CGGO's money is in holdings BCGD also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

11 positions in common, counted across the 39 positions we hold weights for in BCGD and 100 in CGGO, against full books of 80 and 106.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 41 positions for CGGO that do not appear in our book for BCGD (40.8% of the fund), and 16 for BCGD that do not appear in CGGO (32.8%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in BCGDWeight in CGGODifference
2330:TWTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd8.68%7.09%1.59%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc6.51%2.38%4.13%
NVDANvidia Corp7.50%1.29%6.21%
ASL:ASAsml Holding Nv Unsponsored Adr Ordinary Shares4.87%3.17%1.70%
VVisa Inc Class A5.66%0.88%4.78%
METAMeta Platforms Inc3.78%1.62%2.16%
AVGOBroadcom Inc1.01%3.44%2.43%
LLYEli Lilly & Co.3.03%1.33%1.70%
BN:CABrookfield Corp2.78%0.55%2.23%
TDGTransdigm Group Inc.2.04%0.50%1.54%

46.6% of BCGD is already inside CGGO.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

BCGDCGGO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BCGD or CGGO?

BCGD has an expense ratio of 0.75% while CGGO charges 0.47%. CGGO is the cheaper option, by $28 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between BCGD and CGGO?

46.6% of BCGD's money is in holdings CGGO also owns. 23.1% of CGGO's is in holdings BCGD also owns. They hold 11 positions in common, counted across the 39 positions we hold weights for in BCGD and 100 in CGGO.

Which pays a higher dividend, BCGD or CGGO?

BCGD yields 0.00% while CGGO yields 1.00%, so CGGO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is CGGO better than BCGD?

CGGO has a lower expense ratio. CGGO is less concentrated, with 34.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 52.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.