BCGD vs FFND

BCGD vs FFND

Which is better, BCGD or FFND?

BCGD costs less.

BCGD has a lower expense ratio. FFND is less concentrated, with 27.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 52.4%.

Lower Fees: BCGDLess Concentrated: FFND

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBCGDFFND
Expense Ratio0.75%Best1.00%
AUM-$96M
Dividend Yield0.00%0.61%
Holdings8092
YTD Return+3.14%+4.71%Best
1Y Return-+7.86%
3Y Return (annualized)-+19.41%
5Y Return (annualized)-+4.62%
Top 10 Weight52.4%27.0%Best
Fund FamilyBaron FundsThe Future Fund
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Growth
InceptionDec 12, 2025Aug 24, 2021

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

BCGD vs FFND growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare BCGD against instead:BCGD vs SPYBCGD vs QQQBCGD vs VOOBCGD vs VTIFFND against:FFND vs VXUS

BCGD vs FFND Performance

Baron Global Durable Advantage ETF (BCGD) is an ETF from Baron Funds and One Global ETF (FFND) is an ETF from The Future Fund. Year to date, BCGD is up 3.14% versus a gain of 4.71% for FFND.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BCGD charges 0.75% per year while FFND charges 1.00%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $100 annually, a gap of $25 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BCGD currently yields 0.00% against 0.61% for FFND.

Holdings Overlap

BCGD already in FFND34.8%
FFND already in BCGD15.4%

34.8% of BCGD's money is in holdings FFND also owns. 15.4% of FFND's money is in holdings BCGD also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

7 positions in common, counted across the 39 positions we hold weights for in BCGD and 88 in FFND, against full books of 80 and 92.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 62 positions for FFND that do not appear in our book for BCGD (65.9% of the fund), and 18 for BCGD that do not appear in FFND (37.0%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in BCGDWeight in FFNDDifference
NVDANvidia Corp7.50%3.48%4.02%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc6.51%4.29%2.22%
2330:TWTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd8.68%1.48%7.20%
VVisa Inc Class A5.66%1.09%4.57%
METAMeta Platforms Inc3.78%1.54%2.24%
AVGOBroadcom Inc1.01%2.18%1.17%
TMOThermo Fisherscientific Inc.1.64%1.36%0.28%

34.8% of BCGD is already inside FFND.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

BCGDFFND

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BCGD or FFND?

BCGD has an expense ratio of 0.75% while FFND charges 1.00%. BCGD is the cheaper option, by $25 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between BCGD and FFND?

34.8% of BCGD's money is in holdings FFND also owns. 15.4% of FFND's is in holdings BCGD also owns. They hold 7 positions in common, counted across the 39 positions we hold weights for in BCGD and 88 in FFND.

Which pays a higher dividend, BCGD or FFND?

BCGD yields 0.00% while FFND yields 0.61%, so FFND currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is FFND better than BCGD?

BCGD has a lower expense ratio. FFND is less concentrated, with 27.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 52.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.