BCGD vs KLXY
Baron Global Durable Advantage ETF vs KraneShares Global Luxury Index ETF
Which is better, BCGD or KLXY?
KLXY costs less.
KLXY has a lower expense ratio. BCGD is less concentrated, with 52.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 64.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BCGD | KLXY |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.69%Best |
| AUM | - | $2M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.84% |
| Holdings | 80 | 31 |
| Top 10 Weight | 52.4%Best | 64.8% |
| Fund Family | Baron Funds | KraneShares |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Dec 12, 2025 | Sep 7, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
The two price series end 215 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. BCGD has data through Oct 14, 2026 and KLXY through Mar 13, 2026.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BCGD charges 0.75% per year while KLXY charges 0.69%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $69 annually, a gap of $6 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BCGD currently yields 0.00% against 0.84% for KLXY.
Holdings Overlap
1.1% of BCGD's money is in holdings KLXY also owns. 3.7% of KLXY's money is in holdings BCGD also owns.
KLXY and BCGD share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 246 days apart, BCGD as of Oct 3, 2026 and KLXY as of Jan 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
1 positions in common, counted across the 39 positions we hold weights for in BCGD and 23 in KLXY, against full books of 80 and 31.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 6 positions for KLXY that do not appear in our book for BCGD (30.3% of the fund), and 23 for BCGD that do not appear in KLXY (63.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BCGD | Weight in KLXY | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| RACE:MIFerrari NV | 1.05% | 3.73% | 2.68% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BCGD and KLXY you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BCGD or KLXY?
BCGD has an expense ratio of 0.75% while KLXY charges 0.69%. KLXY is the cheaper option, by $6 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between BCGD and KLXY?
3.7% of KLXY's money is in holdings BCGD also owns. 3.7% of KLXY's is in holdings BCGD also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 39 positions we hold weights for in BCGD and 23 in KLXY.
Which pays a higher dividend, BCGD or KLXY?
BCGD yields 0.00% while KLXY yields 0.84%, so KLXY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is KLXY better than BCGD?
KLXY has a lower expense ratio. BCGD is less concentrated, with 52.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 64.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.