BCIL vs RINT
Bancreek International Large Cap ETF vs Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF
Which is better, BCIL or RINT?
RINT has been ahead.
RINT has a lower expense ratio. RINT led over 1Y and the full window. RINT is less concentrated, with 12.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BCIL | RINT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.80% | 0.49%Best |
| AUM | $89M | $156M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.72% | 0.81% |
| Holdings | 60 | 364 |
| YTD Return | +0.98% | +7.35%Best |
| 1Y Return | -1.44% | +14.43%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.0% | 12.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -16.2% | -11.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.4 years | $9,846 | $12,593Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 42.0% | 12.1%Best |
| Fund Family | Bancreek Capital Advisors | Russell Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 21, 2024 | May 13, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 14, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.4 years).
BCIL vs RINT growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.4 years both funds cover.
BCIL vs RINT Performance
Bancreek International Large Cap ETF (BCIL) is an ETF from Bancreek Capital Advisors and Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF (RINT) is an ETF from Russell Investments. Over the past year BCIL returned -1.44% while RINT returned +14.43%. Year to date, BCIL is up 0.98% versus a gain of 7.35% for RINT.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BCIL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.0% compared with 12.2% for RINT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.2% for BCIL and -11.9% for RINT. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BCIL charges 0.80% per year while RINT charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $80 vs $49 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BCIL currently yields 0.72% against 0.81% for RINT.
Holdings Overlap
25.1% of BCIL's money is in holdings RINT also owns. 2.8% of RINT's money is in holdings BCIL also owns.
BCIL and RINT share little of their money.
7 positions in common, counted across the 30 positions we hold weights for in BCIL and 328 in RINT, against full books of 60 and 364.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 7 positions for RINT that do not appear in our book for BCIL (1.7% of the fund), and 0 for BCIL that do not appear in RINT (0.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BCIL | Weight in RINT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 000660:KRSk Hynix Inc Common Stock KRW 5000 | 4.26% | 0.55% | 3.71% |
| NOVN:SMNovartis Ag Ordinary Shares | 3.97% | 0.69% | 3.28% |
| DOL:CADollarama Inc | 4.20% | 0.21% | 3.99% |
| 5803:TKFujikura Ltd | 3.35% | 0.30% | 3.05% |
| 402340:KRSk Square | 3.42% | 0.11% | 3.31% |
| DPLM:LNDiploma Plc | 3.19% | 0.31% | 2.88% |
| BATS:LNBritish American Tobacco Plc Common Stock GBP 25 | 2.70% | 0.64% | 2.06% |
25.1% of BCIL is already inside RINT.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BCIL or RINT?
BCIL has an expense ratio of 0.80% while RINT charges 0.49%. RINT is the cheaper option, by $31 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BCIL or RINT?
Over the past year BCIL returned -1.44% vs +14.43% for RINT, so RINT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), BCIL annualized -1.10% vs +17.90% for RINT. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BCIL or RINT?
BCIL has been the more volatile fund at 16.0% annualized versus 12.2% for RINT. Worst drawdown: BCIL -16.2% vs RINT -11.9%.
Should I hold both BCIL and RINT?
BCIL and RINT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BCIL and RINT?
25.1% of BCIL's money is in holdings RINT also owns. 2.8% of RINT's is in holdings BCIL also owns. They hold 7 positions in common, counted across the 30 positions we hold weights for in BCIL and 328 in RINT.
Which pays a higher dividend, BCIL or RINT?
BCIL yields 0.72% while RINT yields 0.81%, so RINT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RINT better than BCIL?
RINT has a lower expense ratio. RINT led over 1Y and the full window. RINT is less concentrated, with 12.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.