BCTK vs GQGU
Baron Technology ETF vs GQG US Equity ETF
Which is better, BCTK or GQGU?
BCTK has been ahead.
GQGU has a lower expense ratio. BCTK led over 1Y. GQGU is less concentrated, with 57.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BCTK | GQGU |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.49%Best |
| AUM | - | $584M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.16% | 0.95% |
| Holdings | 40 | 77 |
| YTD Return | +17.64%Best | +5.40% |
| 1Y Return | - | +3.28% |
| Top 10 Weight | 57.9% | 57.2%Best |
| Fund Family | Baron Funds | GQG Partners LLC |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Dec 12, 2025 | Jul 31, 2019 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
BCTK vs GQGU growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BCTK vs GQGU Performance
Baron Technology ETF (BCTK) is an ETF from Baron Funds and GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU) is an ETF from GQG Partners LLC. Year to date, BCTK is up 17.64% versus a gain of 5.40% for GQGU.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BCTK charges 0.75% per year while GQGU charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $49 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BCTK currently yields 0.16% against 0.95% for GQGU.
Holdings Overlap
42.4% of BCTK's money is in holdings GQGU also owns. 39.3% of GQGU's money is in holdings BCTK also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
11 positions in common, counted across the 39 positions we hold weights for in BCTK and 38 in GQGU, against full books of 40 and 77.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 25 positions for GQGU that do not appear in our book for BCTK (57.6% of the fund), and 21 for BCTK that do not appear in GQGU (41.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BCTK | Weight in GQGU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 7.12% | 9.37% | 2.25% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 6.29% | 7.25% | 0.96% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.58% | 6.76% | 2.18% |
| LRCXLrcx Uw Equity | 6.61% | 3.12% | 3.49% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 4.78% | 4.08% | 0.70% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 5.02% | 2.56% | 2.46% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 3.73% | 1.29% | 2.44% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.13% | 1.68% | 0.55% |
| AXONAxon Enterprise Inc | 1.80% | 0.81% | 0.99% |
| RTXRaytheon Co. | 0.59% | 1.46% | 0.87% |
42.4% of BCTK is already inside GQGU.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BCTK or GQGU?
BCTK has an expense ratio of 0.75% while GQGU charges 0.49%. GQGU is the cheaper option, by $26 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between BCTK and GQGU?
42.4% of BCTK's money is in holdings GQGU also owns. 39.3% of GQGU's is in holdings BCTK also owns. They hold 11 positions in common, counted across the 39 positions we hold weights for in BCTK and 38 in GQGU.
Which pays a higher dividend, BCTK or GQGU?
BCTK yields 0.16% while GQGU yields 0.95%, so GQGU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is GQGU better than BCTK?
GQGU has a lower expense ratio. BCTK led over 1Y. GQGU is less concentrated, with 57.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.