BCTK vs LRGC
Baron Technology ETF vs AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF
Which is better, BCTK or LRGC?
BCTK has been ahead.
LRGC has a lower expense ratio. BCTK led over 1Y. LRGC is less concentrated, with 44.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BCTK | LRGC |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.39%Best |
| AUM | - | $1.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.16% | 0.53% |
| Holdings | 40 | 72 |
| YTD Return | +17.64%Best | +10.99% |
| 1Y Return | - | +13.29% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.81% |
| Top 10 Weight | 57.9% | 44.8%Best |
| Fund Family | Baron Funds | AllianceBernstein L.P. |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Dec 12, 2025 | Sep 20, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
BCTK vs LRGC growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BCTK vs LRGC Performance
Baron Technology ETF (BCTK) is an ETF from Baron Funds and AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF (LRGC) is an ETF from AllianceBernstein L.P.. Year to date, BCTK is up 17.64% versus a gain of 10.99% for LRGC.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BCTK charges 0.75% per year while LRGC charges 0.39%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $39 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BCTK currently yields 0.16% against 0.53% for LRGC.
Holdings Overlap
38.1% of BCTK's money is in holdings LRGC also owns. 30.4% of LRGC's money is in holdings BCTK also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
9 positions in common, counted across the 39 positions we hold weights for in BCTK and 69 in LRGC, against full books of 40 and 72.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 57 positions for LRGC that do not appear in our book for BCTK (66.8% of the fund), and 24 for BCTK that do not appear in LRGC (53.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BCTK | Weight in LRGC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 7.12% | 8.71% | 1.59% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 6.29% | 6.09% | 0.20% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.58% | 4.69% | 0.11% |
| 2330:TWTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd | 7.78% | 1.33% | 6.45% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 5.02% | 2.93% | 2.09% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 4.78% | 0.76% | 4.02% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.13% | 3.44% | 2.31% |
| RTXRaytheon Co. | 0.59% | 1.56% | 0.97% |
| STXSeagate Technolo | 0.86% | 0.92% | 0.06% |
38.1% of BCTK is already inside LRGC.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BCTK or LRGC?
BCTK has an expense ratio of 0.75% while LRGC charges 0.39%. LRGC is the cheaper option, by $36 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between BCTK and LRGC?
38.1% of BCTK's money is in holdings LRGC also owns. 30.4% of LRGC's is in holdings BCTK also owns. They hold 9 positions in common, counted across the 39 positions we hold weights for in BCTK and 69 in LRGC.
Which pays a higher dividend, BCTK or LRGC?
BCTK yields 0.16% while LRGC yields 0.53%, so LRGC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is LRGC better than BCTK?
LRGC has a lower expense ratio. BCTK led over 1Y. LRGC is less concentrated, with 44.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.