BEDZ vs FNDA
AdvisorShares Hotel ETF vs Schwab Fundamental US Small Company ETF
Which is better, BEDZ or FNDA?
Each has led over a different period.
FNDA has a lower expense ratio. BEDZ led over 1Y, FNDA over the full window. FNDA is less concentrated, with 3.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 53.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BEDZ | FNDA |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.99% | 0.25%Best |
| AUM | $3M | $8.8B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.06% | 1.26% |
| Holdings | 25 | 918 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.5% | 19.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -29.7% | -25.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 5.3 years | $14,948 | $15,690Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 53.1% | 3.6%Best |
| Fund Family | Advisor Shares | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Blend | Small Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 20, 2021 | Aug 15, 2013 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized).
The two price series end 54 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. BEDZ has data through Aug 21, 2026 and FNDA through Oct 14, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 5.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 21, 2021 to Aug 21, 2026 (5.3 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BEDZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.5% compared with 19.4% for FNDA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -29.7% for BEDZ and -25.9% for FNDA. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BEDZ charges 0.99% per year while FNDA charges 0.25%. On a $10,000 position that is $99 vs $25 annually, a gap of $74 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BEDZ currently yields 2.06% against 1.26% for FNDA.
Holdings Overlap
43.3% of BEDZ's money is in holdings FNDA also owns. 0.8% of FNDA's money is in holdings BEDZ also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
The two holdings books were reported 95 days apart, BEDZ as of Jun 30, 2026 and FNDA as of Oct 3, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
9 positions in common, counted across the 24 positions we hold weights for in BEDZ and 910 in FNDA, against full books of 25 and 918.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 879 positions for FNDA that do not appear in our book for BEDZ (97.1% of the fund), and 12 for BEDZ that do not appear in FNDA (48.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BEDZ | Weight in FNDA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| SHOSunstone Hotel Investors Inc | 6.38% | 0.10% | 6.28% |
| PEBPebblebrook Hotel Trust | 6.11% | 0.13% | 5.98% |
| APLEApple Hospitality Reit Inc | 5.96% | 0.18% | 5.78% |
| RLJRlj Lodging Trust | 5.03% | 0.12% | 4.91% |
| DRHDiamondrock Hospitality Co | 4.41% | 0.08% | 4.33% |
| ABNBAirbnb Inc | 4.24% | 0.04% | 4.20% |
| CVEOCiveo Corp Common Stock Usd 0.01 | 4.06% | 0.02% | 4.04% |
| INNSummit Hotel Properties Inc Reit | 3.81% | 0.03% | 3.78% |
| HGVHilton Grand Vacations Inc | 3.26% | 0.14% | 3.12% |
43.3% of BEDZ is already inside FNDA.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BEDZ or FNDA?
BEDZ has an expense ratio of 0.99% while FNDA charges 0.25%. FNDA is the cheaper option, by $74 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, BEDZ or FNDA?
BEDZ has been the more volatile fund at 22.5% annualized versus 19.4% for FNDA. Worst drawdown: BEDZ -29.7% vs FNDA -25.9%.
Should I hold both BEDZ and FNDA?
BEDZ and FNDA have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BEDZ and FNDA?
43.3% of BEDZ's money is in holdings FNDA also owns. 0.8% of FNDA's is in holdings BEDZ also owns. They hold 9 positions in common, counted across the 24 positions we hold weights for in BEDZ and 910 in FNDA.
Which pays a higher dividend, BEDZ or FNDA?
BEDZ yields 2.06% while FNDA yields 1.26%, so BEDZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is FNDA better than BEDZ?
FNDA has a lower expense ratio. BEDZ led over 1Y, FNDA over the full window. FNDA is less concentrated, with 3.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 53.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.