BEDZ vs RMT
AdvisorShares Hotel ETF vs Royce Micro-Cap Trust Inc.
Which is better, BEDZ or RMT?
RMT has been ahead.
BEDZ has a lower expense ratio. RMT led over 1Y and the full window. RMT is less concentrated, with 14.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 53.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BEDZ | RMT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.99%Best | 1.35% |
| AUM | $3M | $830M |
| Dividend Yield | 2.06% | 5.71% |
| Holdings | 25 | 171 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.5% | 21.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -29.7%Best | -31.9% |
| $10,000 over 5.3 years | $14,948 | $18,625Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 53.1% | 14.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Advisor Shares | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Blend | Small Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 20, 2021 | Dec 14, 1993 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized).
The two price series end 54 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. BEDZ has data through Aug 21, 2026 and RMT through Oct 14, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 5.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 21, 2021 to Aug 21, 2026 (5.3 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BEDZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.5% compared with 21.9% for RMT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -29.7% for BEDZ and -31.9% for RMT. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BEDZ charges 0.99% per year while RMT charges 1.35%. On a $10,000 position that is $99 vs $135 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BEDZ currently yields 2.06% against 5.71% for RMT.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 24 holdings in BEDZ and 169 in RMT, totalling 102.5% and 102.3% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 24 positions we hold weights for in BEDZ and 169 in RMT, against full books of 25 and 171.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 148 positions for RMT that do not appear in our book for BEDZ (91.8% of the fund), and 21 for BEDZ that do not appear in RMT (91.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BEDZ and RMT you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BEDZ or RMT?
BEDZ has an expense ratio of 0.99% while RMT charges 1.35%. BEDZ is the cheaper option, by $36 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, BEDZ or RMT?
BEDZ has been the more volatile fund at 22.5% annualized versus 21.9% for RMT. Worst drawdown: BEDZ -29.7% vs RMT -31.9%.
Should I hold both BEDZ and RMT?
BEDZ and RMT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BEDZ or RMT?
BEDZ yields 2.06% while RMT yields 5.71%, so RMT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RMT better than BEDZ?
BEDZ has a lower expense ratio. RMT led over 1Y and the full window. RMT is less concentrated, with 14.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 53.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.