BKCG vs FTCS
BNY Mellon Concentrated Growth ETF vs First Trust Capital Strength ETF
Which is better, BKCG or FTCS?
BKCG has been ahead.
BKCG has a lower expense ratio. BKCG led over 1Y and the full window. FTCS is less concentrated, with 22.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BKCG | FTCS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50%Best | 0.52% |
| AUM | $123M | $7.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.59% | 1.22% |
| Holdings | 30 | 102 |
| YTD Return | +9.20%Best | +6.41% |
| 1Y Return | +12.91%Best | +5.59% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +10.51% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +6.06% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.6% | 10.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -12.1% | -9.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.5 years | $12,865Best | $11,043 |
| Top 10 Weight | 57.9% | 22.5%Best |
| Fund Family | BNY Mellon Investment Management | First Trust Portfolios (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 31, 2025 | Jul 6, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 31, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.5 years).
BKCG vs FTCS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.5 years both funds cover.
BKCG vs FTCS Performance
BNY Mellon Concentrated Growth ETF (BKCG) is an ETF from BNY Mellon Investment Management and First Trust Capital Strength ETF (FTCS) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year BKCG returned +12.91% while FTCS returned +5.59%. Year to date, BKCG is up 9.20% versus a gain of 6.41% for FTCS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BKCG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.6% compared with 10.9% for FTCS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.1% for BKCG and -9.4% for FTCS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.31. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BKCG charges 0.50% per year while FTCS charges 0.52%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $52 annually, a gap of $2 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BKCG currently yields 0.59% against 1.22% for FTCS.
Holdings Overlap
14.1% of BKCG's money is in holdings FTCS also owns. 8.0% of FTCS's money is in holdings BKCG also owns.
BKCG and FTCS share little of their money.
4 positions in common, counted across the 28 positions we hold weights for in BKCG and 50 in FTCS, against full books of 30 and 102.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 46 positions for FTCS that do not appear in our book for BKCG (91.9% of the fund), and 22 for BKCG that do not appear in FTCS (76.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BKCG and FTCS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BKCG or FTCS?
BKCG has an expense ratio of 0.50% while FTCS charges 0.52%. BKCG is the cheaper option, by $2 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BKCG or FTCS?
Over the past year BKCG returned +12.91% vs +5.59% for FTCS, so BKCG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BKCG annualized +18.29% vs +6.84% for FTCS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BKCG or FTCS?
BKCG has been the more volatile fund at 12.6% annualized versus 10.9% for FTCS. Worst drawdown: BKCG -12.1% vs FTCS -9.4%.
Should I hold both BKCG and FTCS?
BKCG and FTCS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.31, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BKCG and FTCS?
14.1% of BKCG's money is in holdings FTCS also owns. 8.0% of FTCS's is in holdings BKCG also owns. They hold 4 positions in common, counted across the 28 positions we hold weights for in BKCG and 50 in FTCS.
Which pays a higher dividend, BKCG or FTCS?
BKCG yields 0.59% while FTCS yields 1.22%, so FTCS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is FTCS better than BKCG?
BKCG has a lower expense ratio. BKCG led over 1Y and the full window. FTCS is less concentrated, with 22.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.