BKCG vs QLTY
BNY Mellon Concentrated Growth ETF vs GMO US Quality ETF
Which is better, BKCG or QLTY?
QLTY has been ahead.
QLTY led over 1Y and the full window. QLTY is less concentrated, with 45.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BKCG | QLTY |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50%Tie | 0.50%Tie |
| AUM | $123M | $5.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.59% | 0.66% |
| Holdings | 30 | 90 |
| YTD Return | +9.20% | +14.13%Best |
| 1Y Return | +12.91% | +20.95%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.84% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.6% | 12.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -12.1% | -11.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.5 years | $12,865 | $14,073Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 57.9% | 45.5%Best |
| Fund Family | BNY Mellon Investment Management | GMO |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 31, 2025 | Nov 13, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 31, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.5 years).
BKCG vs QLTY growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.5 years both funds cover.
BKCG vs QLTY Performance
BNY Mellon Concentrated Growth ETF (BKCG) is an ETF from BNY Mellon Investment Management and GMO US Quality ETF (QLTY) is an ETF from GMO. Over the past year BKCG returned +12.91% while QLTY returned +20.95%. Year to date, BKCG is up 9.20% versus a gain of 14.13% for QLTY.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BKCG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.6% compared with 12.1% for QLTY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.1% for BKCG and -11.7% for QLTY. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.88. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BKCG charges 0.50% per year while QLTY charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $50 annually. On income, BKCG currently yields 0.59% against 0.66% for QLTY.
Holdings Overlap
56.6% of BKCG's money is in holdings QLTY also owns. 43.1% of QLTY's money is in holdings BKCG also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
13 positions in common, counted across the 28 positions we hold weights for in BKCG and 45 in QLTY, against full books of 30 and 90.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 32 positions for QLTY that do not appear in our book for BKCG (56.6% of the fund), and 13 for BKCG that do not appear in QLTY (34.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BKCG | Weight in QLTY | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 6.81% | 8.00% | 1.19% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 10.84% | 3.30% | 7.54% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 7.19% | 3.50% | 3.69% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 5.38% | 4.20% | 1.18% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 4.37% | 4.80% | 0.43% |
| TXNTexas Instrument Inc | 2.63% | 3.80% | 1.17% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.49% | 3.70% | 1.21% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 3.77% | 2.40% | 1.37% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 3.17% | 2.80% | 0.37% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 3.36% | 2.50% | 0.86% |
56.6% of BKCG is already inside QLTY.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BKCG or QLTY?
BKCG has an expense ratio of 0.50% while QLTY charges 0.50%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.
Which performed better, BKCG or QLTY?
Over the past year BKCG returned +12.91% vs +20.95% for QLTY, so QLTY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BKCG annualized +18.29% vs +25.58% for QLTY. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BKCG or QLTY?
BKCG has been the more volatile fund at 12.6% annualized versus 12.1% for QLTY. Worst drawdown: BKCG -12.1% vs QLTY -11.7%.
Should I hold both BKCG and QLTY?
BKCG and QLTY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.88, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BKCG and QLTY?
56.6% of BKCG's money is in holdings QLTY also owns. 43.1% of QLTY's is in holdings BKCG also owns. They hold 13 positions in common, counted across the 28 positions we hold weights for in BKCG and 45 in QLTY.
Which pays a higher dividend, BKCG or QLTY?
BKCG yields 0.59% while QLTY yields 0.66%, so QLTY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QLTY better than BKCG?
QLTY led over 1Y and the full window. QLTY is less concentrated, with 45.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.