BKCI vs QQQ
BNY Mellon Concentrated International ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, BKCI or QQQ?
All Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. BKCI is less concentrated, with 46.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BKCI | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $128M | $506.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.38% | 0.42% |
| Holdings | 33 | 321 |
| YTD Return | +0.02% | +19.30%Best |
| 1Y Return | +1.93% | +22.47%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +6.51% | +26.18%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.42% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.5%Best | 21.1% |
| Max Drawdown | -31.0%Best | -35.1% |
| $10,000 over 4.8 years | $10,434 | $18,677Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 46.2%Best | 46.7% |
| Fund Family | BNY Mellon Investment Management | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | All Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Dec 6, 2021 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 8, 2021 to Oct 14, 2026 (4.8 years).
BKCI vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.8 years both funds cover.
BKCI vs QQQ Performance
BNY Mellon Concentrated International ETF (BKCI) is an ETF from BNY Mellon Investment Management and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year BKCI returned +1.93% while QQQ returned +22.47%. Year to date, BKCI is up 0.02% versus a gain of 19.30% for QQQ.
Over three years, BKCI compounded at +6.51% per year against +26.18% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.1% compared with 16.5% for BKCI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -31.0% for BKCI and -35.1% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BKCI charges 0.65% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $18 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BKCI currently yields 1.38% against 0.42% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
5.7% of BKCI's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 0.7% of QQQ's money is in holdings BKCI also owns.
BKCI and QQQ share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 29 positions we hold weights for in BKCI and 101 in QQQ, against full books of 33 and 321.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 93 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for BKCI (96.3% of the fund), and 1 for BKCI that do not appear in QQQ (4.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BKCI | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASML:ASASML HOLDING NV | 5.65% | 0.71% | 4.94% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BKCI and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BKCI or QQQ?
BKCI has an expense ratio of 0.65% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $47 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BKCI or QQQ?
Over the past year BKCI returned +1.93% vs +22.47% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BKCI or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 21.1% annualized versus 16.5% for BKCI. Worst drawdown: BKCI -31.0% vs QQQ -35.1%.
Should I hold both BKCI and QQQ?
BKCI and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BKCI and QQQ?
5.7% of BKCI's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 0.7% of QQQ's is in holdings BKCI also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 29 positions we hold weights for in BKCI and 101 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, BKCI or QQQ?
BKCI yields 1.38% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so BKCI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than BKCI?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. BKCI is less concentrated, with 46.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.