BKDV vs MFSV
BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF vs MFS Active Value ETF
Which is better, BKDV or MFSV?
BKDV has been ahead.
MFSV has a lower expense ratio. BKDV led over 1Y and the full window. MFSV is less concentrated, with 32.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BKDV | MFSV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.44%Best |
| AUM | $2.2B | $618M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.53% | 1.41% |
| Holdings | 84 | 64 |
| YTD Return | +17.11%Best | +9.21% |
| 1Y Return | +23.83%Best | +12.64% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.3% | 9.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -15.0% | -12.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.9 years | $13,327Best | $11,981 |
| Top 10 Weight | 33.5% | 32.9%Best |
| Fund Family | BNY Mellon Investment Management | MFS Investment Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Nov 1, 2024 | Dec 5, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 5, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.9 years).
BKDV vs MFSV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.9 years both funds cover.
BKDV vs MFSV Performance
BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF (BKDV) is an ETF from BNY Mellon Investment Management and MFS Active Value ETF (MFSV) is an ETF from MFS Investment Management. Over the past year BKDV returned +23.83% while MFSV returned +12.64%. Year to date, BKDV is up 17.11% versus a gain of 9.21% for MFSV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BKDV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 10.3% compared with 9.6% for MFSV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.0% for BKDV and -12.7% for MFSV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BKDV charges 0.60% per year while MFSV charges 0.44%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $44 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BKDV currently yields 0.53% against 1.41% for MFSV.
Holdings Overlap
35.1% of BKDV's money is in holdings MFSV also owns. 36.5% of MFSV's money is in holdings BKDV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
17 positions in common, counted across the 79 positions we hold weights for in BKDV and 60 in MFSV, against full books of 84 and 64.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 43 positions for MFSV that do not appear in our book for BKDV (60.9% of the fund), and 61 for BKDV that do not appear in MFSV (64.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BKDV | Weight in MFSV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 6.02% | 5.28% | 0.74% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 4.98% | 5.35% | 0.37% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 4.03% | 4.50% | 0.47% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 3.28% | 3.09% | 0.19% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 2.74% | 1.66% | 1.08% |
| RTXRaytheon Co. | 1.58% | 2.20% | 0.62% |
| MSMorgan Stanley | 1.17% | 2.15% | 0.98% |
| BACBank Of America Corp | 0.78% | 2.25% | 1.47% |
| AONAon Public Limited Company Cl. A | 1.26% | 1.68% | 0.42% |
| PMPhilip Morris International Inc. | 1.76% | 1.04% | 0.72% |
36.5% of MFSV is already inside BKDV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BKDV or MFSV?
BKDV has an expense ratio of 0.60% while MFSV charges 0.44%. MFSV is the cheaper option, by $16 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BKDV or MFSV?
Over the past year BKDV returned +23.83% vs +12.64% for MFSV, so BKDV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BKDV annualized +16.32% vs +9.98% for MFSV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BKDV or MFSV?
BKDV has been the more volatile fund at 10.3% annualized versus 9.6% for MFSV. Worst drawdown: BKDV -15.0% vs MFSV -12.7%.
Should I hold both BKDV and MFSV?
BKDV and MFSV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BKDV and MFSV?
36.5% of MFSV's money is in holdings BKDV also owns. 36.5% of MFSV's is in holdings BKDV also owns. They hold 17 positions in common, counted across the 79 positions we hold weights for in BKDV and 60 in MFSV.
Which pays a higher dividend, BKDV or MFSV?
BKDV yields 0.53% while MFSV yields 1.41%, so MFSV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is MFSV better than BKDV?
MFSV has a lower expense ratio. BKDV led over 1Y and the full window. MFSV is less concentrated, with 32.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.