BLOK vs IVV
Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, BLOK or IVV?
Multi Alternative against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. BLOK led over 3Y and the full window, IVV over 1Y and 5Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BLOK | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.73% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1.0B | $896.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.80% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 110 | 508 |
| YTD Return | -5.87% | +13.59%Best |
| 1Y Return | -23.01% | +17.54%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +41.70%Best | +22.46% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +5.66% | +13.28%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 39.9% | 16.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -73.3% | -33.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $13,169 | $18,654Best |
| Fund Family | Amplify ETFs | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jan 16, 2018 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 17, 2018 to Oct 14, 2026 (8.7 years).
BLOK vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8.7 years both funds cover.
BLOK vs IVV Performance
Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF (BLOK) is an ETF from Amplify ETFs and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BLOK returned -23.01% while IVV returned +17.54%. Year to date, BLOK is down 5.87% versus a gain of 13.59% for IVV.
Over three years, BLOK compounded at +41.70% per year against +22.46% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +5.66% and +13.28% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, BLOK has the edge at +14.23% annualized vs +13.27%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BLOK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 39.9% compared with 16.3% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -73.3% for BLOK and -33.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BLOK charges 0.73% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $73 vs $3 annually, a gap of $70 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BLOK currently yields 0.80% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
At least 15.2% of IVV's money is in holdings BLOK also owns.
Stated as a floor: for BLOK, our book for it covers 91.7% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
IVV and BLOK share little of their money.
13 positions in common, counted across the 49 positions we hold weights for in BLOK and 506 in IVV, against full books of 110 and 508.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BLOK | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 1.85% | 8.44% | 6.59% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 3.55% | 1.52% | 2.03% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 1.70% | 2.47% | 0.77% |
| HOODRobinhood Markets Inc - A | 3.98% | 0.13% | 3.85% |
| DELLDell Technologies Inc | 2.87% | 0.25% | 2.62% |
| COINCoinbase Global, Inc. | 2.81% | 0.06% | 2.75% |
| IBMInternational Business Machines Corp. | 2.23% | 0.32% | 1.91% |
| BLKBlackrock Inc, Class A | 2.18% | 0.23% | 1.95% |
| SQBlock, Inc | 2.18% | 0.06% | 2.12% |
| PYPLPaypal Holdings Inc | 1.82% | 0.07% | 1.75% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BLOK and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BLOK or IVV?
BLOK has an expense ratio of 0.73% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $70 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BLOK or IVV?
Over the past year BLOK returned -23.01% vs +17.54% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), BLOK annualized +14.23% vs +13.27% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BLOK or IVV?
BLOK has been the more volatile fund at 39.9% annualized versus 16.3% for IVV. Worst drawdown: BLOK -73.3% vs IVV -33.9%.
Should I hold both BLOK and IVV?
BLOK and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BLOK and IVV?
At least 15.2% of IVV's money is in holdings BLOK also owns. Our book for BLOK is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 13 positions in common, counted across the 49 positions we hold weights for in BLOK and 506 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, BLOK or IVV?
BLOK yields 0.80% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than BLOK?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. BLOK led over 3Y and the full window, IVV over 1Y and 5Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.